The goal of this diagnostic randomised clinical trial is to determine, in glioblastoma patients with diagnostic uncertainty between pseudoprogression and tumor progression on follow-up MRI after chemoradiation, the added value of a direct \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET scan for clinical management. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the clinical management guided by an additional FET-PET scan leads to fewer unnecessary interventions, compared with management based on MRI only? * Does the clinical management guided by an additional FET-PET scan leads to better health-related quality of life after 12 weeks, compared with management based on MRI only? * Does the clinical management guided by an additional FET-PET scan leads to reduced net healthcare costs, compared with management based on MRI only? Researchers will compare the investigational arm, where clinical management is based on the index MRI scan and an additional FET-PET scan, with the control arm, where clinical management is based solely on the index MRI scan, to investigate the added value of the FET PET scan for clinical management. Participants in the investigational arm will undergo the FET PET scan. All participants will complete health-related quality of life questionnaires at four different timepoints.
During follow-up of glioblastoma patients after chemoradiation, expert teams often observe MRI abnormalities with difficulty in distinguishing between tumor growth and pseudoprogression. Although techniques such as perfusion MRI provide additional information, diagnostic uncertainty often remains, leading to incorrect or delayed diagnosis and, inappropriate treatment, such as unnecessary surgery. Despite the good discriminating power of \[¹⁸F\] Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine-PET (FET-PET), this diagnostic tool is not used frequently in the Netherlands due to costs, logistics, and misconceptions about clinical benefit. In the FET POPPING study we aim to determine the added value of \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET for clinical management. A multicenter diagnostic randomised clinical trial will be performed, from July 2024 until December 2027. 144 adult patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma will be included, who, after the concomitant phase of chemoradiation, have increased contrast enhancement on MRI, causing doubt between tumor growth or pseudoprogression. Included patients will be randomised 1:1 in two arms. The investigational arm receives an additional \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET scan, and clinical management is based on the index MRI and \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET together. Clinical management of the control arm is based on the index MRI alone. Exact clinical management, following from the available imaging, is chosen at the discretion of a multidisciplinary board. The primary study endpoints are (a) the percentage of patients undergoing unnecessary interventions and (b) health-related quality of life after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include time-to-diagnosis, overall survival and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesize that the clinical management guided by an additional \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET scan leads to fewer unnecessary interventions, better health-related quality of life after 12 weeks and among others reduced net healthcare costs, compared with management based on MRI only.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
144
Patients in the investigational arm will undergo the extra FET-PET scan, with use of the O-(2- ¹⁸F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (¹⁸F-FET) tracer. FET-PET scanning will be performed according to the joint European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)/European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO)/Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology (RANO) guidelines. In most patients, a static scan (20-40 minutes post-injection) will performed. If the logistics of the research site allow for a dynamic scan (0-60 minutes post-injection), this will be performed. Interpretation will be done by an experienced nuclear medicine physician from the local center according to current European guidelines. Central review will be performed by a panel of nuclear medicine physicians from the study team. Clinical management is based on the index MRI and this additional \[¹⁸F\] FET PET scan.
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Netherlands
UMC Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht, Netherlands
Radboud UMC
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Haaglanden MC
The Hague, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Composite score of proportion (0-100%) of patients undergoing unnecessary interventions.
Determination of 'unnecessary interventions' will be done retrospectively, by the researchers and the treating physician. An 'unnecessary intervention' is defined as: * Biopsy or debulking for diagnostic uncertainty and/or with pseudoprogression as the final pathological diagnosis * The administration of one or more cycles of (temozolomide) chemotherapy as continued treatment for presumed pseudoprogression, in cases with a final diagnosis of tumor progression * The administration of one or more doses of bevacizumab for presumed pseudoprogression, in cases with a final diagnosis of tumor progression
Time frame: at six months
Health-related quality of life: general
This will be reported by the questionnaire EQ5D. The EQ5D is a generic utility questionnaire which allows for comparison of quality of life between indications, and is considered the golden standard by the Dutch National Heath Care Institute. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at twelve weeks
Health-related quality of life: brain tumor specific
This will be reported by the questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Brain Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BN20). The EORTC-QLQ-BN20 is a brain tumor specific questionnaire and is a reliable tool to capture changes in specific health domains for this population. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at twelve weeks
Health-related quality of life: productivity
This will be reported by the questionnaire iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). The iPCQ questionnaire measures productivity losses and is applicable to national and international studies. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at twelve weeks
Health-related quality of life: medical consumption
This will be reported by the questionnaire iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ). The iMCQ questionnaire is an instrument for measuring medical consumption. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at twelve weeks
Cost-effectiveness
Expressed in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). The results of the cost utility analysis will be combined with observed and extrapolated uptake to estimate the budget impact over several relevant time horizons.
Time frame: at six months
Cost-effectiveness
Expressed in Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio's (ICERs). The results of the cost utility analysis will be combined with observed and extrapolated uptake to estimate the budget impact over several relevant time horizons.
Time frame: at six months
Time-to-diagnosis
Defined as index MRI to eventual management, including watchful waiting
Time frame: During the study period (but expected within three months)
Overall survival
Defined from index MRI until death (patients who are still alive at the end of the study will be censored)
Time frame: Through study completion (expected median of less than 1.5 year)
Number of unnecessary treatment cycles
Chemotherapy
Time frame: at six months
Health-related quality of life: general
This will be reported by the questionnaire EQ5D. The EQ5D is a generic utility questionnaire which allows for comparison of quality of life between indications, and is considered the golden standard by the Dutch National Heath Care Institute. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at six weeks and six months
Health-related quality of life: brain tumor specific
This will be reported by the questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Brain Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BN20). The EORTC-QLQ-BN20 is a brain tumor specific questionnaire and is a reliable tool to capture changes in specific health domains for this population. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: at six weeks and six months
Health-related quality of life: productivity
This will be reported by the questionnaire iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). The iPCQ questionnaire measures productivity losses and is applicable to national and international studies. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at six weeks and six months
Health-related quality of life: medical consumption
This will be reported by the questionnaire iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ). The iMCQ questionnaire is an instrument for measuring medical consumption. Both the total score of the questionnaire is used as the individual scores to analyse individual patients' changes over time.
Time frame: at six weeks and six months