The Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension Curriculum is a free, online curriculum developed to educate students and provide them with resources to quit tobacco/nicotine use. The investigation aims to estimate the extent to which Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension changes high school student's knowledge of, attitudes towards, intentions to use, and actual use of tobacco/nicotine.
Youth who use tobacco/nicotine products on school campuses are often detained, suspended, or expelled. Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension is an online curriculum that uses principles of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy, incorporating a restorative practice and trauma-informed lens. The goals of the study are three-fold: (1) Assess changes in the perspectives of school administrators, educators, counselors, and health staff around the feasibility, acceptability, and usefulness of implementing Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension as an appropriate and effective response to tobacco use on campus (including versus suspension or expulsion); (2) Assess high school students' acceptability and perceptions of Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension; and (3) Estimate the extent to which Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension changes high school students' knowledge of, attitudes towards, intentions/susceptibility to use, and actual use of tobacco/nicotine products. The Stanford REACH Lab and California School-Based Health Alliance (CSHA) will partner to evaluate Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension using a school-based randomized waitlist-controlled trial in 20 high schools in California (n = 10 Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension treatment schools and 10 control schools).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
2,540
Healthy Futures: Alternative-to-Suspension Curriculum uses a trauma-informed and restorative practice lens and uses principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to help students understand the harms of nicotine, reduce stress, increase positive coping, and provide resources to quit.
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Change in tobacco/nicotine use
Investigator-originated survey measures (questions) ever tobacco/nicotine use and past 30-day tobacco/nicotine use. All students in both arms will be asked to complete a survey at baseline (just before treatment), follow-up 1 (immediately post-intervention), follow-up 2 (6 months after completing intervention), and so on every 6 months for 2.5 years of the study.
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up 1 (following intervention at one year), follow-up 2 (6 months post-intervention), follow-up 3 (6 months past follow-up 2), and follow-up 4 (6 months past follow-up 3) up to 2.5 years of the study.
Change in intention of tobacco/nicotine use scale score
Participants will self-report changes in their intention/susceptibility to use tobacco/nicotine products using a validated four-point scale in a survey. This survey measures changes in intention to use tobacco/nicotine with questions related to the participant's knowledge of and resistance to the use of tobacco/nicotine products. Susceptibility is measured by the following questions: 1. Have you ever been curious about using an e-cigarette? 2. Do you think that you will try an e-cigarette soon? 3. If one of your best friends were to offer you an e-cigarette, would you use it?" Response options for all three questions included a four-point scale: "Definitely yes," "Probably yes," "Probably not," and "Definitely not."
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up 1 (following intervention at one year), follow-up 2 (6 months post intervention), follow-up 3 (6 months past follow-up 2), and follow-up 4 (6 months past follow-up 3) up to 2.5 years of the study.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.