Toe transfers are perceived to have changed the landscape of the injured hand over the last half century, yet there are limited validated data that unequivocally support the functional role of toe transfers after traumatic digital amputation. There also remain unanswered questions about what factors critically influence functional outcomes, be it sensory recovery, grip strength or other modality. Furthermore, the use of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in large series of toe transfers with long term follow up, is lacking.
Finger amputations are associated with profound impacts on physical, socio-economic, vocational and mental well-being. Thumb amputations account for the greatest burden of disability globally amongst hand trauma. The multi-centre FRANCHISE study and a recent large prospective multi-centre study have demonstrated that finger replantation outperforms equivalent amputations in nearly all digits at all levels, except for the little finger. However, one crucial question in hand surgery is whether toe transfers can provide a similar functional benefit to replantation. Finger amputations are frequently not replantable even with timely access to specialized reconstructive care. A review of replantation in the USA found that of 3,417 digital amputations, only 631 replantations were attempted (18%), and of these 30% failed. Therefore nearly 90% of patients with finger amputations will ultimately live without the amputated digit. Microvascular toe-to-hand transfer, first described in the 1960s, has a success rate close to 100% in high volume centres. There are few validated data that support the functional benefits of toe transfer, with the majority of outcome studies focusing on operative survival rates, physical measurements such as grip strength, or employ unvalidated scales and self-created questionnaires. More data, in larger more representative populations, using validated PROMs, is required. Here, we aim to demonstrate using PROMS that the role of toe transfers has equivalent or improved functional benefits, with comparison to finger replantation. Additionally, this study aims to identify physical factors that have the greatest influence on patient reported outcomes. This may answer fundamental questions regarding optimum strategies for the design of toe transfers.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
75
Toe-to-hand transfer
Finger or thumb replantation after amputation
Michigan Hand Questionnaire
Validated Hand function patient reported outcome measured. 0-100. Higher is better
Time frame: Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery
Short Form 36
Short Form 36 Quality of Life. 0-100. Higher is better
Time frame: Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery
Foot Function Index
Validated foot function Patient reported outcome measure. 0-100. Lower is better
Time frame: Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery
Aesthetic evaluation
Subjective evaluation of toe transfer appearance using a Visual Analogue Scale, not validated
Time frame: Longitudinal. 3 timepoints: 1 day before surgery, 1 day after surgery, and on average 22 years after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.