Traumatic injuries affect people of all ages, races, and socioeconomic backgrounds. The Global Burden of Disease study showed that globally in 2019, there were more than 4.4 million deaths due to injury. Furthermore, unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death for people aged 5-29 years worldwide. Uncontrolled bleeding accounts for a significant proportion of these deaths, with approximately 20% occurring in the first 24 hours and 40% occurring within the first 30 days. Blood transfusion is a life-saving treatment in the management of bleeding patients until bleeding is controlled in hospital, typically delivered through different blood components (red blood cells, plasma and platelets). These components are derived from a whole blood donation and are stored in separate bags (units). There are challenges in carrying separate blood products, such as additional weight in kit bags, and transfusing multiple blood products at the scene can delay transport to hospital. In Ontario, Ornge Air Ambulance carries red blood cells and plasma to transfuse prehospital. However, a prehospital transfusion strategy has not been established and practice varies across the Canadian setting, and more broadly across the world. This trial aims to investigate if carrying and transfusing two units of whole blood instead of four units (two red blood cells and two plasma) is feasible and leads to better outcomes for patients.
Early blood transfusion improves survival in patients with life-threatening bleeding, but the optimal transfusion strategy in the prehospital setting has yet to be established. Although there is some evidence of benefit with the use of Whole Blood (WB), there have been no RCTs exploring the clinical effectiveness of prehospital administration of WB versus component therapy for bleeding trauma patients in the Canadian setting. The lack of high-quality clinical evidence is recognized in the recent NAC recommendations for the use of WB in Canada. In collaboration with the SWiFT UK team, the SWiFT Canada study will follow the SWiFT UK protocol but as adopted for the Canadian context. This may allow for future comparisons on effectiveness of the two systems and pilot the ability for two countries with different prehospital systems to be able to follow a similar study protocol for future international RCTs. Lastly, we have confirmed the support from CBS for the manufacturing and distribution of WB for the duration of the SWiFT Canada trial. Therefore, it is essential for patients, healthcare professionals and blood services that the clinical effectiveness of prehospital WB transfusion is evaluated in a trial before its widespread implementation across CBS in Canada. A national program of WB production would necessitate significant changes in the current manufacturing processes for blood services, in order to provide appropriate support for hospitals. WB production could potentially affect the supply of blood components required to treat other patients, as a unit of WB cannot be used to manufacture other components. However, it could also be argued that early transfusion of WB may reduce the need for further blood component transfusion when patients arrive at hospital, due to earlier control of bleeding. Following the proposed objectives of this pilot RCT would enable us to evaluate all these uncertainties and assist in the planning of a future larger RCT.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
2 units of whole blood administered by Ornge AAS
2 units of RBC + 2 units of plasma administered by Ornge AAS
Ornge Air Ambulance
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGProportion of patients enrolled in the study that receive a prehospital transfusion and had full study data collected
Feasibility target: \>90% patients enrolled were able to link prehospital to in-hospital records and \>90% complete data obtained
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Number of patients that completed transfusion of at least 1 unit of assigned blood products prior to arrival to receiving lead trauma hospital
Feasibility target: at least 1 unit of blood \[WB, RBC, or plasma\] transfused prior to arrival \>90% of the time
Time frame: Enrolment to day 1 after enrolment
Number of patients that completed transfusion of all assigned blood products at the receiving lead trauma hospital
Feasibility target: \>90% if not already done prior to arrival of hospital
Time frame: Enrolment to day 1 after enrolment
Number of patients screened for the study by not randomized due to lack of group O negative WB availability.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
To describe the distribution, redistribution and wastage of WB units produced for the study
Feasibility target: \<10% wastage of WB units produced for the study
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Death or Massive Transfusion at 24hrs
To determine the impact of prehospital administration of WB on the proportion of participants who experience death or massive transfusion at 24 hours, compared to the current standard of care (component blood therapy).
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Mortality - 90 days
To determine the impact on mortality up to 90 days.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Mortality - 30 days
To determine the impact on morbidity up to 30 days.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Organ Failure Free Days
To determine the impact of organ failure free days (hospital resource use) up to discharge
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Critical Care Days
To determine the impact of time spent in critical care (hospital resource use) up to discharge
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Total in-patient stay
To determine the impact on total in-patient stay (hospital resource use) up to discharge
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Blood components received
To determine the impact on blood components received (hospital resource use) up to discharge
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
Hemostatic agents received
To determine the impact additional hemostatic agents received (hospital resource use) up to discharge
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
treatment-emergent adverse events
To assess the safety and tolerability of prehospital transfusion by the incidence of treatment-emergent transfusion adverse events.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.