This phase Ib trial tests the safety, side effects, best dose and effectiveness of tagraxofusp in combination with azacitidine as maintenance therapy in treating patients with CD123 positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after a donor (allogeneic) hematopoietic cell transplant. An allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a type of transplant where the cancer patient receives cells from another person. Maintenance therapy is given after the transplant to prevent the cancer from coming back. Tagraxofusp is a drug that targets cells that have CD123 on their surface in order to kill the cancer cells to help prevent the cancer from coming back. Azacitidine is in a class of medications called demethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells. Giving tagraxofusp in combination with azacitidine may be safe, tolerable and/or effective maintenance therapy in patients with CD123 positive AML and MDS after an allogeneic HCT.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluate the safety and feasibility of tagraxofusp-erzs (tagraxofusp) with a fixed dose of azacitidine and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for tagraxofusp in patients with CD123-positive hematological malignancy when given as maintenance therapy following allogeneic transplant (HCT). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 1 year after starting maintenance therapy. II. Evaluate the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 and 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days post-HCT, secondary graft failure, and chronic GVHD at 1-year after HCT. III. Estimate the cumulative incidence of infections in the first 100 days from the start of maintenance therapy. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Describe kinetics of immune cell recovery during 1st year post-HCT and during maintenance therapy with tagraxofusp-azacitidine (TAG-AZA). II. Assess the possible correlation between chimerism kinetics (per next generation sequencing \[NGS\]/ quantitative polymerase chain reaction \[qPCR\] assay) and post-HCT relapse during maintenance therapy with TAG-AZA. III. Characterize the presence and level of GVHD biomarkers and inflammatory cytokines in the first 100 days from the start of maintenance therapy. IV. Assess patients' quality of life (QOL) at baseline (before initiation of the first cycle) then at the end of cycles 3 and 6 (± 2 weeks); optional questionnaire. V. Longitudinally assess CD123 expression on hematopoietic cells. VI. Assess changes in symptoms of chronic GVHD using Lee Symptom Scale; patient self-report. VII. Describe transplant outcomes defined in the secondary objectives among all consented patients regardless of receiving the study therapy. OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of tagraxofusp in combination with azacitidine followed by a dose-expansion study. Patients receive tagraxofusp intravenously (IV) over 15 minutes once daily (QD) on days 1-3 and azacitidine IV over 10-40 minutes QD on days 1-5 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then annually for up to 2 years after start of protocol therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
43
Given IV
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy
Undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy
Ancillary studies
Given IV
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
RECRUITINGIncidence of adverse events (AEs)
Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5.0. AEs will be recorded by type, severity, duration, and attribution or association with the study regimen and occurrence. Tables will be constructed to summarize the observed incidence, severity and type of toxicity. Point estimates and corresponding exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be provided for each measure of toxicity/AEs.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Dose limiting toxicities (DLT)
DLTs will be graded according to the NCI CTCAE v5.0. AEs will be recorded by type, severity, duration, and attribution or association with the study regimen and occurrence. Tables will be constructed to summarize the observed incidence, severity and type of toxicity. Point estimates and corresponding exact 95% CIs will be provided for each measure of toxicity/AEs.
Time frame: Up to the end of cycle 1 on day 28
Percent of patients completing at least 3 cycles at assigned dose level
Feasibility will be defined as 50% of patients completing at least 3 cycles of maintenance therapy at the assigned dose level. The point estimate and exact 95% CIs will be provided.
Time frame: Up to 180 days
Overall survival (OS)
OS will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curves.
Time frame: From start of protocol therapy to death, assessed at 100 days and 1 year
Progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curves.
Time frame: From start of protocol therapy to relapse or progression, or death, assessed at 100 days and 1 year
Relapse/progression
Time frame: From start of therapy to the first observation of relapse or progression, assessed at 100 days and 1 year
Non-relapse mortality
Time frame: From start of therapy until non-disease related death, assessed at 100 days and 1 year
Incidence of grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD)
AGVHD will be estimated using the cumulative incidence curve. AGVHD will be graded according to the Mount Sinai Acute Graft Versus Host Disease International Consortium Grading System.
Time frame: From start of protocol therapy to aGVHD onset date, assessed up to 100 days
Incidence of secondary graft failure
Incidence of secondary graft failure will be defined as cytopenias after initial engraftment (absolute neutrophil count \< 500/uL) with donor chimerism of less than 5% or falling donor chimerism with intervention such as second transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion or death due to cytopenias, and fall in donor chimerism, even if chimerism was \> 5%.
Time frame: Up to 1 year post transplant
Incidence of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD)
CGVHD will be scored according to National Institute of Health Consensus Staging. CGVHD will be estimated using the cumulative incidence curve.
Time frame: From start of protocol therapy to cGVHD onset date, assessed up to 1 year post transplant
Infection rate
Microbiologically documented infections will be reported by site of disease, date of onset, severity and resolution, if any.
Time frame: In the first 100 days from the start of maintenance therapy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.