With a prevalence of 2-4% in western countries, Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is of major concern regarding its substantial impact on the social and physical quality of life. So far, endoscopic sinus surgery remains the treatment of choice when the first line of medical treatment with corticosteroid has failed. During the last 15 years, several studies have shown that CRSwNP is associated with a T helper 2 (T2) immune response leading to B cell release of IgE, mucosal recruitment of eosinophils from bone marrow via Interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4 and IL-13 mediated chemoattractant production. New biologic agents capable of blocking T2 cytokines have been developed in the field of eosinophil-associated diseases, shifting the paradigm of treatment for patients with CRSwNP. In the near future, endotype profiling with accurate biomarkers will be mandatory to tailor the treatment of nasal polyposis with specific biologic therapies. Herein the investigators propose a prospective study monitoring medical records of CRSwNP patients who undergo biologic treatments. The objectives are to assess treatment efficacy on quality of life, to report clinical and biological criteria for prescription and to measure tolerance and compliance.Patient-reported outcomes will be addressed according to their initial clinical profile (allergy, asthma, NSAID, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obstructive apnea, otologic disorder, smoke habit).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
900
Drug prescription according to their marketing approval (subcutaneously, every month or every two weeks).
CHU de Lille
Lille, France
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGchu de Lille
Lille, France
RECRUITINGComparison of quality of life over 5 years according to the asthmatic status of the patients
Assessment of disease control with the Sino-nasal outcome test-22. from 0 to 110, 110=worst outcome
Time frame: 5-year follow-up
Quality of life progression in patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
Assessment of disease control with the Sino-nasal outcome test-22. from 0 to 110, 110=worst outcome
Time frame: Evaluation after 6 months of treatment with biologics
Patient reported symptoms measurement
Number of oral corticosteroid treatment courses between each visit (in grammes)
Time frame: Month 0, Month 3, Month 6, and every 6 months until 5 years
Time to first surgical procedure since the beginning of biologic treatment
Date and type of sinus surgery between each visit
Time frame: MMonth 0, Month 3, Month 6, and every 6 months until 5 years
Blood eosinophil count and total IgE blood concentrations evolution during the course of the 5-year follow-up
Number off cells per mm3
Time frame: Month 0, Month 3, Month 6, and every 6 months until 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.