The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AVATAR therapy, developed to address residual auditory hallucinations persisting despite medication in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The intervention aims to reduce the intensity and frequency of these symptoms, as well as alleviate associated depressive and anxiety symptoms, using a virtual reality (VR)-assisted intervention developed for this purpose by the Danish company HEKA VR. The study will be a pre-post non-invasive, waiting list-controlled study, enrolling 30 patients from three clinical sites (Hungary, Spain, Poland). The study centers around administering therapy based on VR over a 12-week period, comprising a total of 7 sessions. These sessions are conducted individually and last 50 minutes each. The psychotherapist leading the sessions adheres to a strict protocol defined by the method's developers. During the intervention, VR technology is used to simulate the source of distressing auditory hallucinations. The therapist facilitates coping with these experiences externalized in this way through simulated conversations, supporting the development of more adaptive responses. Patients undergo a comprehensive cross-sectional evaluation of their condition before and after the intervention, including assessments of symptom severity, quality of life, and their experience with the method. The intervention is conducted with constant monitoring for possible adverse effects.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
90
In the initial phase of treatment, patients collaborate with therapists to visualize the source of their auditory hallucinations. Therapists adjust their voice to match the hallucinations, prompting patients to recall key statements for future sessions. Subsequent sessions involve dialogues with a computerized avatar. Using the altered voice, therapists interact in real-time through the avatar, engaging patients in role-playing. They alternate between the avatar and supportive therapist roles to empower patients with positive affirmations and discussions. Sessions last approximately 50 minutes, utilizing Oculus Rift VR headsets and noise-cancelling headphones to enhance immersion. HEKA VR software adjusts avatar proximity, and patients have the option to record dialogues for home use and sharing. Therapists receive bi-weekly supervision from HEKA VR-trained colleagues. Participants continue their regular medication prescribed by their psychiatrists alongside this experimental therapy
Semmelweis University
Budapest, Hungary
RECRUITINGUniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi
Lodz, Poland
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUnitat de Recerca del Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu
Barcelona, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGChange in symptom severity
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: Assesses overall symptom severity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, including positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, delusions), negative symptoms (e.g., affective flattening, social withdrawal), and general psychopathology (e.g., anxiety, depression).The scale is administered through a semi-structured interview by trained clinicians. The minimum possible score for positive and negative symptoms is 7 points, and the maximum possible score is 49 points. For general symptomatology, the possible minimum score is 16 points, and the maximum score is 112 points. The overall score can range from 30-210. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in severity of auditory hallucinations
Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales: Evaluates the severity of auditory hallucinations and associated delusions, including frequency, duration, loudness, and disruption. The scale is administered through a semi-structured interview by trained clinicians. The scale comprises 17 items of the mentioned specific dimensions of hallucinations and delusions, with each item being rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). The total score range for the test is 0 to 68, where lower scores indicate reduced severity of hallucinatory experiences.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in beliefs about voices in schizophrenia spectrum disorder
Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire-Revised: A self-report questionnaire designed to assess individuals' beliefs about auditory hallucinations (e.g.: how important the voices are to the individual, perceived control, emotional reactions elicited by the voices. The scale comprises 35 items, with each item being rated from 0 to 3. The total score range for the test is 0-105, where lower scores indicate reduced distress and improved coping with hallucinatory experiences.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in comorbidity (depression)
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia: Evaluates the severity of depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. It is administered through a semi-structured interview, conducted by trained clinicians. The scale comprises 9 items, with each item being rated from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The total score range for the test is 0 to 27, where lower scores indicate reduced depressive symptoms and improved comorbidity management.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in comorbidity (anxiety)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A self-report questionnaire designed to assess anxiety levels in individuals. It distinguishes between two types of anxiety: State Anxiety: Refers to temporary feelings of anxiety that are situational and can fluctuate based on current circumstances. Trait Anxiety: Refers to a stable characteristic of an individual, reflecting a general tendency to respond with anxiety across various situations. The test consists of 40 items, with 20 items dedicated to measuring state anxiety and 20 items for trait anxiety. Respondents indicate how they feel on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Scores for each sub-scale can range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in health-related quailty of life
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale: A standardised instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. It consists of two main components: the descriptive system and the visual analog scale. The descriptive system includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Respondents rate their health status in each dimension on a scale from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), resulting in a profile that can be converted into a single index value. The visual analog scale allows individuals to rate their overall health on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in subjective well-being
World Health Organisation Well-being Index: A brief self-report measure designed to assess subjective well-being and overall quality of life. Comprising five items, the index evaluates key aspects of emotional well-being over the past two weeks, including mood, energy, and general happiness. Respondents rate each item on a scale from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 25. Higher scores indicate better well-being and psychological health.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in emotion regulation
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: A self-report measure designed to assess individual differences in the habitual use of two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. The questionnaire consists of 10 items, with respondents indicating their agreement on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The possible total scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores on cognitive reappraisal typically associated with better psychological outcomes, while higher scores on expressive suppression may be linked to various negative effects.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in self-efficacy
General Self-Efficacy Scale: A self-report scale designed to assess perceived self-efficacy in coping with various stressors and challenges. The scale consists of 10 items that assess confidence in one's ability to handle different situations and overcome obstacles. Respondents rate each item on a scale from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (exactly true). Scores can range from 10-40, with higher scores indicate greater perceived self-efficacy.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.