Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study to evaluate the impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing synthetic haemodialysers against the ATA membrane of the Solacea™.
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover, non-masked study that included 32 patients from 4 Spanish hospitals. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing synthetic haemodialysers against the ATA membrane of the Solacea™. Study population. Patients over 18 years of age in a chronic haemodialysis program who had been on dialysis for more than three months were included. All patients provided informed consent. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The exclusion criteria were allergies to synthetic membranes and allergies to heparin, patients receiving anticoagulant treatment, women Pregnant, breastfeeding or patients with cognitive impairment. In each of the two phases of six consecutive two-week HD sessions, patients were dialyzed according to their usual schedule with the haemodialyser assigned after randomization (synthetic vs ATA membrane). During the six sessions of both phases, the dose of heparin was progressively reduced, 100% usual heparin dose in the first session until sixth session without heparin. After each session, carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score previously published. Dialyser score from 0 (completly clean, 0% coagulated fibers) to 4 (100% coagulated fibers). Venous chamber score from 0 (clean, without clotting) to 3 (complete oclusión, dialysis is not possible). Demographic data and dialysis parameters were also collected. The dialyzers from 8 patients were collected at the beginning and end of each study arm and scanned with a reference non-invasive micro-CT (Computed Tomography) scanning technique.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
32
The duration of the study was four weeks, carried out in two phases. After screening, patients were randomized to be dialyzed with the Solacea™ hemodialyzer versus the usual hemodialyzer, which in all cases had to be a synthetic membrane. In both arms, heparin was progressively decreased until it was discontinued. Afterwards the patients were crossed over to the other arm.
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
Madrid, Spain
Impact on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit by comparing dialyzers
The investigators measure the impact of Solacea membrane on the thrombogenicity of the haemodialysis circuit compared to other high-permeability synthetic dialysers commonly used in clinical practice. Heparin was progressively reduced until it was discontinued. After each session, investigators carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score. In 8 patients also a scanning technique was carried out.
Time frame: four weeks, carried out in two phases
Effect of heparin reduction or discontinuation
The investigators measure the effect of heparin reduction or discontinuation on vascular access haemostasis time, on dialysis efficacy by measuring KT, on percentage reduction of molecules such as myoglobin or β2-microglobulin, and in the amount of convective volume in patients in OL HDF. During the six sessions of both phases, the dose of heparin was progressively reduced until the last session without heparin. After each session, carried out a visual inspection of the venous chamber and the haemodialyser and assigned a coagulation score. In 8 patients also a scanning technique was carried out.
Time frame: four weeks, carried out in two phases
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.