Frailty in Outpatient Digestive Endoscopy

Overview

The increase in our society of the proportion of frail people who suffer from disability and dependency forces us to detect modifiable factors and therefore subject to intervention that can adapt health care for frail patients in order to increase the effectiveness and safety of medical treatments and procedures. A geriatric assessment should be performed on all patients likely to present frailty prior to a digestive endoscopy to assess the risk-benefit of the indication and to improve patient preparation by avoiding adverse effects of endoscopic examinations, increasing the safety and profitability of the tests There are no data in our medium on the prevalence of frailty in patients referred for endoscopy, nor on the incidence in these patients of adverse effects, inadequate preparations, or incomplete examinations, so a frailty study is needed to elaborate multidisciplinary protocols that improve circuits and care in these patients and prevent complications. The questions we want to try to answer are: * Prevalence and severity of fragility in digestive endoscopy. * Specific problems related to fragility in digestive endoscopy, mainly the profitability of the examination and the incidence of adverse effects, in order to create protocols for improving care in this group of patients.

This is a prospective observational study. In all patients older than 70 years referred for an ambulatory endoscopy, the presence of frailty and its degree will be assessed through validated questionnaires commonly used in the preparation of the patient for digestive endoscopy. A nurse trained by the Geriatrics Service of our hospital carries out a telephone contact with the patient or the patient's caregiver to fill out the questionnaires. The formation of subgroups of patients will be assessed for the statistical analysis in relation to the degree of frailty and the type of endoscopy (upper or lower digestive endoscopy) A random sample of 1474 individuals is sufficient to estimate, with 95% confidence and an accuracy of +/- 2.5 percentage units, a prevalence of frailty in the study population that is expected to be around 40%. Given that at this stage it is a cross-sectional study, no follow-up losses are expected. Since the main aim of the study is cross-sectional, it is necessary to estimate the prevalence of frailty and a 95% confidence interval calculated using an exact method (Clopper-Pearson method). The analysis of the profitability of the indication and of the adverse effects, as outcomes of interest in the achievement of the secondary objectives, will be analyzed according to the degree of frailty (main factor of the study). Likewise, the effect of potentially confounding variables will be studied, on the degree of fragility, and also on each of the outcomes taken into consideration. Finally, a multivariate analysis for each outcome will be used to evaluate the possible causal association with the degree of frailty, adjusting in each analysis for potentially confounding variables. For the analyzes the statistical package STATA 15.1 and R will be used in the version that is updated at the time of the statistical analysis. Basic patient demographic data (age, sex) will be collected. The presence of multipathology will be assessed using the CIRS(G)-Charlson questionnaire. Data related to the patient's frailty will be collected using the CFS and FRAGIL-VIG questionnaires. Information about the endoscopic procedure will be collected with data recorded in the medical history. The cleaning agent and the degree of compliance with the colon cleaning protocol (diet, fasting, volume ingested, fractionation of the cleaning agent) will be noted in the clinical history, as well as the incidents that occurred in relation to the preparation for endoscopy. In the endoscopic report, data on the preparation of the colon and intra-trial complications will be recorded. Information on post-test complications will be collected with the data recorded in the clinical record. Only relevant adverse effects that require medical attention will be recorded, not considering minor adverse effects because they are not relevant to our study, since they do not provide information that helps to improve the care of the fragile patient in the field of endoscopy. Frailty is defined as a CFS rating greater than 4 or a FRAGIL-VIG value greater than 0. Adequate preparation is defined as a Boston Cleansing Classification rating of 2 or 3 in each and every segment of the colon. The endoscopy indication is defined as unprofitable in the following cases: * The patient does not show up or reschedules the examination * The patient appears but it is not possible to perform the examination due to decompensation of the underlying pathology or for not having been able to comply with the test preparation protocols. * The patient appears and the endoscopic examination is carried out, but it is not possible to give an adequate diagnosis or to carry out a therapeutic under safe conditions. The cost-effectiveness calculation will be done by calculating the overall percentage of patients in which there are no situations that prevent an adequate diagnosis and/or therapy, and the causes of lack of cost-effectiveness will be calculated based on the assumptions explained in the text.The calculation of the cost of the endoscopy indication is closely related to the concept of profitability. All cases with a lack of profitability conceptually maintain the indication of the test and therefore need repetition of their request, given that the diagnostic-therapeutic objective of the initial indication has not been achieved. The cost of the hypothetical repetition of these scans will be calculated based on the prices established for each type of endoscopy and a cost comparison will be made between the different degrees of fragility. A relevant adverse effect is defined in the following cases: * Decompensation of underlying pathology that requires hospital care * Complications related to sedation * Post-colonoscopy bleeding * Post-colonoscopy perforation