This study is a randomized immunogenicity study in an enrolled cohort with active surveillance for influenza-like illness (ILI). During this study, participants will be randomly assigned to receive an approved cell culture-based influenza vaccine (Flucelvax®) versus a licensed comparator influenza vaccine (Flublok®). Blood samples from participants will be collected for measurement of biomarkers of immune response at baseline (visit 1; day 1), post-vaccination (visit 2; day 29), and post-season (visit 3; day 181). Participants will be asked if they wish to also provide saliva specimens at baseline (visit 1; day 1), post-vaccination (visit 2; day 29), and post-season (visit 3; day 181). Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and plasma samples will be isolated from whole blood and tested for biomarkers of vaccine immunogenicity, and duration of antibody responses. Participants will receive electronic surveys via email or text message weekly asking about changes in health status and new ILI symptoms; those reporting illness may be asked to provide a respiratory swab for laboratory testing for influenza and other respiratory viruses and up to 2 additional blood draws (acute \[\<10 days after symptom onset\] and convalescent \[28 days after acute visit if lab-confirmed positive for influenza\]).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
606
Participants will receive Flucelvax® (ccIIV3)
Participants will receive Flublok® (RIV3)
Valleywise Health Comprehensive Health Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
ASU Biodesign Institute
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Washington University IDCRU
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANEOHS)
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Department of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Percent of Participants With a Seroprotective HAI Titer (≥1:40)
The percent of participants with a seroprotective antibody titer (≥1:40) for each influenza vaccine antigen was determined. Cell-grown A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria were measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), while A(H3N2) titers were measured by microneutralization.
Time frame: Visit 2 (Days 28-42, Post-vaccination)
The Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of HAI Antibody
The geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) for each influenza vaccine antigen in the 2024-2025 influenza season. GMTs were calculated as the anti-log of the mean of log-transformed titers. Cell-grown A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), whereas A(H3N2) was assessed by microneutralization.
Time frame: Up to Visit 2 (Days 28-42, Post-vaccination)
Percent of Participants Demonstrating Seroconversion From Baseline
The percent of participants in each vaccination group demonstrating seroconversion from Baseline at Day 29 (defined as a titer ≥1:40 at Day 29 if the baseline titer is \<1:10, or a ≥4-fold rise in titer at Day 29 if the baseline titer is ≥1:10) for each vaccine antigen. Viruses tested were cell-grown A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria using hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), and A(H3N2) using microneutralization.
Time frame: Day 29 post-vaccination assessment (Visit 2; scheduled for Day 29 with an allowable window of Days 28-42 post-vaccination)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise (GMFR) in HAI Titer From Baseline
The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in antibody titers from Baseline to Day 29 for each influenza vaccine antigen. Cell-grown A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria were assessed using hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), whereas A(H3N2) was assessed using microneutralization.
Time frame: Day 29 post-vaccination assessment (Visit 2; scheduled for Day 29 with an allowable window of Days 28-42 post-vaccination)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.