Objectives: (1) To assess the therapeutic effects of tDCS on improving depressive symptoms in young individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), relative to sham stimulation ; and (2) to evaluate the tolerability, and feasibility of tDCS in young individuals with Major Depressive Disorder, to explore the feasibility for a scale-up study. Hypothesis: 1) we hypothesize the tDCS stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) will reduce symptoms of depression more than sham stimulation, demonstrated by significant difference in change of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and 2) tDCS active stimulation of the dLPFC will be tolerable and feasible among patients with MDD, as demonstrated by minimal adverse effects measured in the Adverse Events Questionnaire, adherence (with reasons of drop out), their motivation and enjoyment to participate in the study .
The incidence of probable depression during the fifth peak of COVID-19 was 24.6%, within the HK population, with the youths having experienced a disproportionately higher rate. A recent epidemiology survey conducted in HK revealed the 12-month prevalence of suicidal ideation among young individuals above secondary school age to be an alarming 8.4%. While guidelines and RCTs support the use of medication and psychotherapy as a standalone or combination treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) in youths, a large proportion do not respond to either medication or psychotherapy. There is therefore an unmet need for new, effective treatment options for depression that can be tolerated by young individuals. Transcranial direct current simulation (tDCS) has its acute-effect is physiological change that reduces the threshold of membrane polarisation and increased the synaptic excitability. A handful of studies suggested that anodal stimulation of the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is effective in reducing depressive symptoms in adults, however, whether similar effects applies to youth remains unknown. tDCS is portable, relatively inexpensive, and easy to use, proving to be very safe and tolerable for young individuals with minimal and temporary side effects.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
8
Treatment followed common tDCS protocol upon considering safety and tolerability, comprising five consecutive sessions in five days of 30-minute 2 mA tDCS. We utilized the Soterix Medical tDCS device (Soterix Medical, New York, NY, USA, Model 1x1 tDCS-CT) in the research lab and the Sooma Oy device (Sooma Depression Therapy Comfort, Helsinki, Finland) for patient self-administration.Sooma provided two of their portable tDCS devices for a brief period, including one customized sham device.Due to the limited availability of the Sooma devices, participants were randomly allocated to either the Sooma or. Due to the limited availability of the Sooma devices, participants were randomly allocated to either the Sooma or the Soterix device based on availability during their initial session. A current of 2 mA was applied with the anode positioned left DLPFC, corresponding to area F3 in the international 10-20 system. The cathode (reference electrode) was applied at the right dPLFC, F4.
Sooma provided two of their portable tDCS devices for a brief period, including one customized sham device for effective blinding, distinguishable only by serial number and managed by an external data manager following the randomization sequence.To ensure blinding to the participant and their caregiver, at the beginning of the stimulation sessions, participants receiving both the active and sham stimulation would experience a ramp-up in current from 0 to 2 mA, and then the current would ramp down to 0 mA for participants receiving sham stimulation. Participants were told that they may experience sensations such as tingling, headache, or mild burning during the first 30-60 seconds of the stimulation session but that they may subside afterwards as they got used to it. In other words, participants would not be able to tell if diminishing of side effects were due to habituation (active tDCS) or ramping down of current (sham tDCS).
University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 17 items
Measuring depressive symptoms, score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 53 (maximum); higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment scale (SOFAS)
Measures social and occupational functioning across work functioning, independent functioning, immediate and extended social network functioning; score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), higher score indicates higher social and occupational functioning ability.
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Role Functioning Scale (RFS)
Measures role functioning in four areas: work productivity, independent living, immediate and extended social network relationships; score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 7 (maximum) on each aspect, higher score indicates better role functioning
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Global Functioning: Social Scale and Role Scale
Measures social and role functioning; score ranges from 1 (minimum) to 10 (maximum); higher score indicates better social/role functioning
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Short-form measure of health status with 12 questions.
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Clinical Global Impression Scale
Measures the severity of illness and global improvement following an intervention; scores ranges from 1 (normal/very much improved) to 7 (most severely ill/very much worse), with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: T1 (immedately after intervention)
Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation.
Measures self-reported suicidal ideation; score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 38 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a greater risk of suicide.
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Two VASs were used to measure motivation and willingness during intervention. Each VAS contains a scale of 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) with higher scores indicating more
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (C-SHAPS)
Gold standard, self-rated scale measuring anhedonia symptoms. Each item ranges from 0 to 3, hence total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 42 (maximum) with higher scores indicating more anhedonic symptoms
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Chinese version of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (C-DARS)
17-item self-rated questionnaire measuring anhedonia symptoms. Each item ranges from 0 to 4, hence total score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum) with higher scores indicating lower levels of anhedonia symptoms
Time frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (immedately after intervention)
Adherence rate to the participation of the tDCS study
Adherence rate of full participation in each tDCS session; and the reason of skipping the tDCS session if any
Time frame: from T0 (baseline) to T1 (immedately after intervention)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.