In this pilot study the focus is to assess the perceived impact of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on post-exercise recovery in University athletes. The objective is to determine if FST can expedite recovery and enhance overall well-being by reducing muscle soreness and fatigue. The FST protocol will be implement by a certified FST level 2 practitioner. Upon completion of the FST intervention athletes will complete a self-assessment questionnaire. The study aims to provide empirical support for FST's efficacy in improving post-exercise recovery and contributing to the health and performance of university athletes.
Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the perceived effects of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on post-exercise recovery among university athletes at UBCO. By focusing solely on this aspect, the study aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how FST influences recovery processes in the context of rigorous athletic training. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that integrating FST into the post-exercise routine of university athletes will result in expedited recovery, manifested through reduced muscle soreness and fatigue. We expect that the tailored FST sessions will contribute positively to the athletes' overall well-being, allowing them to maintain peak performance levels. Justification: The justification for this study lies in addressing a gap in current research by honing in on the specific impact of FST on post-exercise recovery. As athletes constantly seek methods to optimize their performance, understanding the potential benefits of FST in this context becomes crucial for informed and evidence-based interventions. Objectives: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of FST in enhancing post-exercise recovery among university athletes. Specifically, the study aims to analyze the reduction in muscle soreness and fatigue, providing empirical support for the inclusion of FST in athletic recovery programs. Research Design: This pilot study adopts a mixed methods one group post-test only design to a allow the understanding of perceived FST in enhancing post-exercise recovery. Participants will complete questionnaires and short semi-structured interviews. Statistical Analysis: This study will employ descriptive statistical analysis for the questionnaire data and thematic analysis for the interview data.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
Fascial Stretch Protocol uses a combination of circumduction, traction, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and specific FST maneuvers. Stretch is applied in both active \& passive methods taking into consideration: (1) Oscillatory - slow passive joint oscillations (back and forth movement in a regular rhythm). Small controlled oscillations help with proprioceptors around the joints, acilitates blood flow, gently stretches the ligaments, tendons, nerves, \& muscles and slows the nervous system down; (2) Traction - allows for assessment of the joint capsule movement and to decompress the joint. (3) Movement - designed to enhance the reflexes and are intentionally gentle to maximize benefits; (4) PNF - helps improve flexibility by alternating muscle contractions and relaxations. This stimulates the neuromuscular system, allowing muscles to relax deeper and increase range of motion. (5) Breath - allows the body to increase oxygen consumption to facilitate recovery.
Perceptions of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on Post-Exercise and Post-Training Recovery Among UBCO Varsity Athletes
This study aims to assess the perceptions of UBCO varsity athletes regarding the impact of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on their post-exercise and post-training recovery. Participants will undergo a 30-minute FST intervention for four sessions over four weeks. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants post-intervention to gain an understanding of their experiences with FST as part of their athletic training and conditioning.
Time frame: Interviews will be conducted within one week after the completion of the 4th FST session.
Improvement in overall range of motion and functioning
Assessed using the SF-36, a widely used tool for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL). All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. In addition, each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Improvement in overall range of motion - back
Assessed using the Revised Oswestry Disability Index (RODI) which evaluates perceived functional limitations related to lower back pain. Each of the 10 sections is scored separately (0 to 5 points each) and then added up (max total = 50). Higher scores are indicative of greater disability.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Improvement in overall range of motion - neck
Assessed using The Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire which assesses perceived functional limitations related to neck pain. Each section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means 'No pain' and 5 means 'Worst imaginable pain'.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5