This phase III trial compares the effectiveness of pembrolizumab and sacituzumab govitecan to standard of care in treating patients with urothelial cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Sacituzumab govitecan is a monoclonal antibody, called sacituzumab, linked to a chemotherapy drug called govitecan. Sacituzumab attaches to TROP2 positive tumor cells in a targeted way and delivers govitecan to kill them. The usual treatment approach is treatment with chemotherapy such as cisplatin, carboplatin, gemcitabine, docetaxel or paclitaxel. Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy drug that blocks the cells from making deoxyribonucleic acid and may kill tumor cells. Docetaxel is in a class of medications called taxanes. It stops tumor cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Paclitaxel is in a class of medications called antimicrotubule agents. It stops tumor cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Giving pembrolizumab and sacituzumab govitecan may be more effective than usual care of carboplatin or cisplatin with gemcitabine, docetaxel or paclitaxel in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between the therapy of physician choice (TPC) arm and the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression free survival (PFS) between the TPC arm and the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. II. To evaluate overall response rate (ORR) between the TPC arm and the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. III. To evaluate clinical benefit rate (complete response \[CR\]/partial response \[PR\] /stable disease \[SD\]) between the TPC arm and the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. IV. To evaluate duration of response (DoR) between the TPC arm and the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. V. To evaluate toxicity of the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). EXPLORATORY HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL) OBJECTIVES: I. To compare HRQOL, as assessed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBISI-18) summary score between patients on the TPC arm versus the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm at 6 months. II. To compare HRQOL change from baseline, as assessed by the FBISI-18 summary score, for patients on the TPC arm versus the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. III. To compare the change in patient-reported fatigue from baseline and across 3, 6, and 12 months as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) summary score; change from baseline will be compared between patients on the TPC arm versus the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. IV. To compare quality-adjusted survival (overall survival x health utility score assessed by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level \[EQ-5D-5L\]) between patients on the TPC arm versus the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. V. To compare time to HRQOL deterioration in global HRQOL, as measured by the FBISI-18 disease-related physical symptom subscale (FBISI-18 disease-related symptoms (DRS) in the physical emotional domains \[DRS-P\]), between patients on the TPC arm versus the sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab arm. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive TPC with carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously (IV) on day 1 and gemcitabine IV on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may alternately receive TPC with docetaxel IV on day 1 of each cycle or paclitaxel IV on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients additionally undergo blood sample collection and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study. ARM B: Patients receive sacituzumab govitecan IV over 1-3 hours on days 1 and 8 and pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 35 cycles or for 2 years of pembrolizumab in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cycles of sacituzumab govitecan repeats every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients additional undergo blood sample collection, and CT or MRI throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days then once a year for 5 years from the date of randomization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
320
Undergo blood sample collection
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo CT
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo MRI
Given IV
Given IV
Ancillary studies
Given IV
Kootenai Health - Coeur d'Alene
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
RECRUITINGKootenai Clinic Cancer Services - Post Falls
Post Falls, Idaho, United States
RECRUITINGKootenai Clinic Cancer Services - Sandpoint
Sandpoint, Idaho, United States
RECRUITINGCarle at The Riverfront
Danville, Illinois, United States
Overall survival (OS)
OS will be characterized with the method of Kaplan-Meier and will be compared between the two treatment arms using stratified log-rank test. The hazard ratio (HR) will be estimated, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) will be reported.
Time frame: From randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS will be assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. PFS will be characterized with the method of Kaplan-Meier and will be compared between the two treatment arms using stratified log-rank test. The HR will be estimated, and a 95% CI will be reported.
Time frame: From randomization to the earlier progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Overall response rate (ORR)
ORR will be assessed among patients who received at least one dose of protocol therapy using RECIST v 1.1 criteria. ORR will be defined as the number of patients with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) divided by the number of treated patients. ORR will be calculated based on the definition by arm and will be reported with 95% CI.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Clinical benefit rate (CBR)
CBR will be defined as CR, PR, or stable disease per RECIST v 1.1. CBR will be calculated based on the definition by arm and will be reported with 95% CI.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Duration of response (DOR)
DOR will be assessed by RECIST v1.1. DOR will be characterized with the method of Kaplan-Meier and will be compared between the two treatment arms using stratified log-rank test. The HR will be estimated, and a 95% CI will be reported.
Time frame: From the first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 5 years
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
AEs will be graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The percentage of patients with toxicities will be tabulated. The 90% CI for the true probability of observing toxicity of ≥ grade 4 on a given arm will be no wider than 12.3 %. The probability of observing ≥ 1 toxicity on a given arm with a true rate of 1% is 85.5%.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drug
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois - Decatur
Decatur, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGDecatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGCarle Physician Group-Effingham
Effingham, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGCrossroads Cancer Center
Effingham, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGCarle Physician Group-Mattoon/Charleston
Mattoon, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGCarle BroMenn Medical Center
Normal, Illinois, United States
RECRUITING...and 61 more locations