Clinical trial with an active ingredient of a pharmaceutical specialty marketed in Spain vs. placebo. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone compared to placebo in patients with severe influenza.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
42
placebo 1 capsule (6 mg) /day for 7 days.
dexamethasone 1 capsule (6 mg)/day for 7 days
Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis de Alicante (centro coordinador)
Alicante, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital General Universitario de Elche
Elche, Spain
RECRUITINGTo compare the percentage of patients hospitalized
To compare the percentage of patients hospitalized with influenza according to treatment arm (oseltamivir-dexamethasone vs oseltamivir-placebo) with status 3 or higher according to the Hospital Recovery Scale (status 3: hospitalization with supplemental oxygen, or 4: ICU admission without invasive mechanical ventilation, or 5: with invasive mechanical ventilation, or 6: death) on day 7 after the start of treatment.
Time frame: 10 days
The National Early Warning Score
To compare the time, in days, between initiation of treatment and clinical stability according to the NEWS2\<2 scale for 24 hours or until hospital discharge, taking the value of the first of the two events to occur
Time frame: 10 days
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale
To compare the frequency of serious adverse effects between groups (grades 3, 4 and 5 on the CTCAE scale).
Time frame: 10 days
Rate of metabolic impact of dexamethasone
To evaluate the metabolic impact of dexamethasone by comparing the function of occurrence of sustained hyperglycemia level 1 and 2, and episodes of hyperglycemia during and at the end of dexamethasone treatment.
Time frame: 10 days
the average hospital stay
To compare the average hospital stay (expressed in days) according to treatment group.
Time frame: 10 days
Number of pacients in ICU admission
To compare the function of occurrence over time of clinical failure, defined as progression to: need for ICU admission, need for intubation or death.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 10 days
mortality
To compare mortality at days 10, 30 and 90 post-randomization.
Time frame: 90 days
the impact of treatment Barthel Index
To evaluate the impact of treatment on dependency (Barthel Index) at the time of discharge or at the end of treatment, and at 30 and 90 days after randomization. The final score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the maximum independence and 0 being the maximum dependence.
Time frame: 90 days
the impact of treatment Clinical Frailty Score
To evaluate the impact of treatment on frailty (Clinical Frailty Score) at the time of discharge or at the end of treatment, and at 30 and 90 days after randomization. . level descriptions and their corresponding labels. Most notably, CFS level 2 changed from "Well" to "Fit", level 4 from "Vulnerable" to "Living with Very Mild Frailty", and levels 5-8 were restated as "Living with..." mild, moderate, severe, and very severe frailty, respectively
Time frame: 90 days
To evaluate the impact of steroid treatment on the evolution of the nasal microbiome expressed in alpha diversity.
To evaluate the impact of steroid treatment on the evolution of the nasal microbiome expressed in alpha diversity. Using NGS and then the consecutive bioinformatic analysis. More specifically, the alpha diversity would be the result of the Shannon Index and the number of ASVs (Amplicon sequence variant).
Time frame: 10 days
the kinetics of influenza virus in nasopharyngeal swabs using Ct
To evaluate the kinetics of influenza virus in nasopharyngeal swabs (using Ct and ) in both groups.
Time frame: 10 days
the kinetics of influenza virus in nasopharyngeal swabs using viral quantification per human cell
To evaluate the kinetics of influenza virus in nasopharyngeal swabs (viral quantification per human cell) in both groups.
Time frame: 10 days
Evaluation inflammatory markers CRP
Evaluation the impact of treatment on inflammatory markers CRP
Time frame: 10 days
Evaluation inflammatory markers PCT
Evaluation the impact of treatment on inflammatory markers PCT
Time frame: 10 days
Evaluation inflammatory markers IL-6
Evaluation the impact of treatment on inflammatory markers IL-6
Time frame: 10 days
Evaluation inflammatory markers IL-10
Evaluation the impact of treatment on inflammatory markers IL-10
Time frame: 10 days