The goal of this clinical study is to learn about the safety and tolerability of bictegravir/lenacapavir (BIC/LEN) and to learn how the study drug interacts with the body in virologically suppressed (VS) children and adolescents with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) on a stable and complex antiretroviral (ARV) regimen. The study will also assess the safe loading dose of LEN and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BIC/LEN. The primary objectives of this study are: * To evaluate the steady-state PK of BIC and LEN and confirm the dose of the LEN loading dose and BIC/LEN FDC in VS children and adolescents with HIV-1. * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of BIC/LEN through Week 24 in VS children and adolescents with HIV-1.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Tablets administered orally without regard to food
Children's National Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Grady Ponce de Leon Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Helios Salud S.A
Buenos Aires, Argentina
ASST FBF Sacco Ospedale Sacco
Milan, Italy
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, UOS Infezioni Complesse e Perinatali
Roma, Italy
FAMCRU Ukwanda School for Rural Health
Cape Town, South Africa
Be Part Yoluntu
Cape Town, South Africa
Durban International Clinical Research Site, Enhancing Care Foundation
Durban, South Africa
...and 11 more locations
PK Parameter: Cmax of BIC and LEN at Steady State
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug at steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
PK Parameter: AUCtau of BIC and LEN at Steady State
AUCtau is defined as the area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval at steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Ctrough of BIC and LEN at Steady State
Ctrough is defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval at steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 24, as appropriate
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Week 24
Time frame: First dose date up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 24
Time frame: First dose date up to Week 24
PK Parameter: AUClast for BIC and LEN at Steady State
AUClast is defined as the area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration at steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Tmax for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax at steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Tlast for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Tlast is defined as the time (observed time point) of Clast at steady state. Clast is defined as the last measurable concentration (above the quantification limit).
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: T1/2 for BIC and LEN at Steady State
T1/2 is defined as the terminal elimination half-life at steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: CL for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Clearance (CL) is the volume of plasma cleared of drug over a specified time period, at a steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: Vz for BIC and LEN at Steady State
Volume of distribution (Vz) is defined as the extent to in which the drug is distributed in the body tissue, rather than the plasma, to produce the desired effects at a steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
PK Parameter: λz for BIC and LEN at Steady State
λz is defined as the terminal elimination rate constant, which determines the rate at which the drug will be eliminated from the body after it is absorbed and distributed at a steady state.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 48, as appropriate
Percentage of Participants Experiencing TEAEs Through Week 48
Time frame: First dose date up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
Time frame: First does date up to Week 48
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL and ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 24 Based on the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL and ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 Based on the United States FDA-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time frame: Week 48
Change from Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Counts at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change from Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change from Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts at Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Change from Baseline in CD4 Percentage at Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of LEN Oral Loading Dose at Day 1 Assessed by Questionnaire
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Time frame: Day 1
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of LEN Oral Loading Dose at Day 2 Assessed by Questionnaire
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Time frame: Day 2
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) at Day 1 Assessed by Questionnaire
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Time frame: Day 1
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN FDC at Week 4 Assessed by Questionnaire
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Time frame: Week 4
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN FDC at Week 24 Assessed by Questionnaire
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Time frame: Week 24
Acceptability and Palatability Summary of Oral BIC/LEN FDC at Week 48 Assessed by Questionnaire
Palatability and acceptability assessed by a numeric response between numbers 1-5. Higher scores indicate better palatability and acceptability.
Time frame: Week 48
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.