A single center, prospective, randomized, comparative study of visual field assessments between the TEMPO, VisuALL, and HFA perimeters. Subjects will be assessed at 1 visit. Clinical evaluations will include MD, PSD, FT, VFI, OCT, and a questionnaire.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
54
Automated perimetry
North Georgia Eye Associates
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
Total Acquisition Time (Both Eyes)
The total time to complete automated perimetry in both eyes.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 0)
Mean Deviation (MD)
visual field mean deviation (unit = decibels)
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 0)
Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD)
visual field pattern standard deviation (unit = decibels) PSD is a measure of visual field irregularity.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 0)
Foveal Threshold (FT)
visual field foveal threshold (unit = decibels)
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 0)
Patient Questionnaire
A series of 9 Likert style questions (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) that patients answered about the comfort, ease of use, and anxiety with each device. Strongly Agree was considered a better outcome for comfort and ease of use questions, and Strongly Disagree was considered a better outcome for anxiety questions.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 0)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.