This is a clinical trial that aims to compare the success rate, child and parent acceptance of conventional Hall crown technique (CHT) to modified Hall crown technique (MHT)in treating carious primary molars. Eligible children will receive CHT on one side and MHT on the other side. The time interval between both visits will be 1-2 weeks.Patients demographics and pain history will be recorded and pre-operative radiographs will be taken. An observer will assess and record the child's pain perception during each treatment visit. Time taken for each procedure will be recorded by the research assistant each visit prospectively from the moment the child sits on the dental chair till the end of procedure. Parental preference and child acceptance for each procedure will be recorded after treatment is finished using parent and child questionnaire. Clinical follow up will be conducted at 3,6 and 12 months to assess and compare the success rates of both techniques. Radiographs will be taken at 12 months to evaluate and compare radiographic success.
This is a split mouth randomized clinical trial that aims to compare the success rate, child and parent acceptance of conventional Hall crown technique (CHT) to modified Hall crown technique (MHT)in treating carious primary molars. Eligible children will receive CHT on one side and MHT on the other side. The time interval between both visits will be 1-2 weeks.Patients demographics and pain history will be recorded and pre-operative bitewings will be taken. An observer (research assistant who will be trained, calibrated, and blinded to the treatment used) will assess and record the child's pain perception during treatment visit. Time taken for each procedure will be recorded by the research assistant each visit prospectively from the moment the child sits on the dental chair till the end of procedure. Parental preference and child acceptance for each procedure will be recorded after treatment is finished using parent and child questionnaire. Clinical follow up will be conducted at 3,6 and 12 months to assess and compare the success rates of both techniques.Bitewings will be taken at 12 months to assess for crown fit and radiographic pathology.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
121
preformed metal crowns (PMCs) cemented with no local anesthesia, caries removal or tooth preparation.
preformed metal crowns (PMCs) cemented with no local anesthesia, caries removal or tooth preparation but with interproximal slicing.
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Irbid, Jordan
Pain score
child's pain perception during intervention recorded by research assistant using sound,eyes and motor (SEM) scale
Time frame: during intervention
Child discomfort score
Self-reported Child's discomfort after intervention using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Time frame: immediately following intervention
Child acceptance of treatment
Self-reported child acceptance using questionnaire
Time frame: immediately following intervention
Parent acceptance of treatment
Parental acceptance using questionnaire
Time frame: immediately following intervention
Rate of clinical success
Absence of pain symptoms/ dental abscess requiring pulp therapy or extraction ,assessed through taking pain history and clinical examination
Time frame: 6,12 months
Rate of radiographic Success
Absence of radiographic pathology in the root and the bone in the inter-radicular area.
Time frame: 12 months
Time taken for intervention
Time taken for intervention
Time frame: during intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.