Upon completion, this project will determine if treatment of metabolic acidosis in non-diabetic study participants with reduced kidney function (chronic kidney disease \[CKD\] stage 3) associated with high blood pressure (hypertension) and macroalbuminuria, the latter indicating pronounced kidney injury, using either base-producing fruits and vegetables (F+V) or standard therapy for treatment of metabolic acidosis with the medication sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) 1) slows progression of CKD toward end-stage renal disease \[ESRD\]; 2) improves indices of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; and 3) better preserves plasma acid-base parameters. These studies are designed to compare the differential effects of treating the metabolic acidosis of CKD with F+Vs or NaHCO3 on kidney outcomes, including progression to ESRD, on indices of CVD risk and on plasma acid-base parameters.
The long-term objective of this study is to determine if treatment of metabolic acidosis in study participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and very high levels of urine albumin excretion (macroalbuminuria) reduces risk for further eGFR decline and/or for subsequent development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The specific aims of this study are to determine if metabolic acidosis treatment with either base-producing fruits and vegetables (F+V) in amounts calculated to reduce participant dietary acid content by half, or sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, 0.3 mEq/kg body weight, an amount designed to match the alkali content of provided F+V) in participants with stage 3 CKD (eGFR 30 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m2) compared with Usual Care 1) slows CKD progression; 2) improves indices of cardiovascular risk; and 3) better preserves plasma acid-base parameters. Despite blood pressure control with "kidney protective" drugs like angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, many patients with CKD and reduced eGFR have progressive eGFR decline toward end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with need for dialysis or kidney transplant to maintain life. They also have increased risk to die of CVD. Studies from our laboratory and those of other investigators support that treatment of metabolic acidosis slows GFR decline in animal models of CKD. Many patients with CKD stage 3 have metabolic acidosis that might exacerbate eGFR decline and its treatment might slow or stop it. This study will recruit participants with hypertension-associated CKD stage 3 (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2) without diabetes to avoid contribution of diabetes to eGFR decline. They will have macroalbuminuria (urine albumin \[mg\]-to-creatinine \[g\] ratio \> 200 mg/g) that increases their CKD progression risk to optimize the chance to see benefits of metabolic acidosis treatment. They will have plasma total CO2 (PTCO2) \< 24 but \> 22 millimolar (mM) to recruit participants with metabolic acidosis that is not severe enough to warrant treatment by current guidelines (with oral NaHCO3) to ethically randomize participants to received non-recommended treatment for metabolic acidosis (F+V) or no treatment (Usual Care). Participants whose PTCO2 decreases to 22 mM or below during follow up will be treated with oral NaHCO3 tablets with the goal to maintain their PTCO2 \> 22 mM. All will undergo blood pressure control to target systolic blood pressure \< 130 mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) with regimens including ACE inhibition and will receive atorvastatin because their macroalbuminuria puts them at increase CVD risk. At study entry and yearly for 10 years, all participants will have 10 ml of blood drawn from an antecubital vein for measurement of the negative log of free hydrogen ion concentration (pH), partial pressure of carbon dioxide gas (PCO2), PTCO2, creatinine, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, Lp(a) cholesterol, sodium, potassium, and chloride. They will have 20 ml of urine collected for measurement of creatinine, albumin, N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase, angiotensinogen, and isoprostane 8-isoprostaglandin F2 alpha. They will also have an 8-hour urine collection at a Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) clinic at baseline, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years for PTCO2, pH, ammonium, titratable acidity, creatinine, sodium, and potassium after fasting after midnight. The course of plasma and urine parameters over the 10 years of follow up in those randomized to F+V or NaHCO3 compared to Usual Care will help determine the effect(s) treatment of metabolic acidosis on CKD progression (change in urine indices of kidney injury and eGFR), indices of CVD risk (change in LDL, HDL, and Lp(a) cholesterol), and on participant acid-base status (serum acid-base parameters \[pH, PCO2, bicarbonate concentration \[HCO3\], and PTCO2). These studies will also determine differences in metabolic acidosis treatment with F+V vs. NaHCO3. We hypothesize that metabolic acidosis treatment with F+V or NaHCO3 will 1) slow CKD progression indicated by lower urine kidney injury indices and slower eGFR decline; 2) improve indices of cardiovascular risk indicated by lower LDL, lower Lp(a), and higher HDL cholesterol; and 3) improve plasma acid-base status indicated by higher PTCO2. Excretion of urine acid-base parameters will help determine effects of these treatments on urine acid excretion. Blood pH and PCO2 will be measured using the Immediate Response Mobile Analysis (IRMA) blood analysis system and blood and urine concentrations of albumin and creatinine will be measured with standard techniques. Blood and urine PTCO2 will be measured as done previously with fluorimetry in the PI's laboratory. Urine ammonium, titratable acidity, N-Acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, angiotensinogen, and isoprostane 8-isoprostaglandin F2 alpha will be measured as done previously in the laboratory of the Co-PI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
108
Participants will receive a prescribed amount of F+V designed to reduce their dietary acid intake by half. This typically amounts to 2-4 cups daily of F+V provided in weekly allotments. Amount provided will be that calculated for the participant multiplied times number of household members to assure participants eat the prescribed amount and do not share with household members.
Participants will receive 0.3 mEq/kg bw/day NaHCO3 tablets to match the alkali provided by F+V given to F+V participants. This will be provided as 650 mg NaHCO3 tablets for an average of 4-5 tablets/day in two divided oral doses.
Participants will receive standard medical care but no additional alkali (F+V nor NaHCO3).
Difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at follow up
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) will be calculated using measured serum creatinine and cystatin-C concentrations, age, sex, and whether or not of African American ethnicity using a standard accepted formula. eGFR will be compared among the three groups yearly up to 10 years follow up to assess chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Milestone assessments will be done at 3, 5, and 10 years. Higher eGFR indicates better-preserved kidney function. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to better preserved (higher) eGFR.
Time frame: eGFR will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in the rate of eGFR change during follow up
The rate of eGFR change (ml/min/1.73 m2/year) will assess CKD progression. It will be calculated by dividing the net change in eGFR between the milestone year of follow up and baseline divided by the years of follow up. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to a slower rate of eGFR change, indicative of slower CKD progression.
Time frame: eGFR rate of change will be measured at 3, 5, and 10 years
Difference in the net eGFR change during follow up
The net eGFR change (ml/min/1.73 m2) will assess CKD progression and will be calculated by subtracting the milestone value from the baseline value. The investigators hypothesize that dietary acid reduction will lead to a smaller net eGFR change, indicative of less CKD progression.
Time frame: eGFR net change compared to baseline will be measured at 3, 5, and 10 years
Difference in the number of participants who reach need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT)
Differences in the number of participants who reach the need for KRT will be determined by comparing the number of participants among arms who reach the need for dialysis or kidney transplant; this is a measure of how well the interventions protect kidney health. The investigators hypothesize that the F+V or NaHCO3 arms will have fewer participants reaching KRT.
Time frame: Number of participants reaching KRT will be determined at years 3, 5, and 10 from baseline
Difference in change in urine albumin excretion during follow up
CKD progression will be assessed by change in the urine albumin (mg)-to-creatinine (g) ratio (UACR) in a "spot" urine. An increased UACR is indicative of kidney injury and risk for subsequent decrease of kidney function with time. A decrease in UACR is indicative of reduced kidney injury and a lower risk for decreased kidney function with time. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to a lower UACR. • UACR will be compared among the three groups as follows: Value at 3,5, and 10 years Net change compared to baseline value at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: UACR will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in urine N-acetyl-D -glucosaminidase (UNAG) excretion during follow up
CKD progression will be assessed by change in the UNAG (Units)-to-creatinine (g) ratio in a "spot" urine. An increased UNAG/creatinine ratio is indicative of increased kidney injury. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to a lower UNAG/creatinine. • UNAG/creatinine will be compared among the three groups as follows: Value at 3, 5, and 10 years Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: UNAG will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in urine angiotensinogen (UATG) excretion during follow up
CKD progression will be assessed by change in the UATG (ug)-to-creatinine (g) ratio in a "spot" urine. An increased UATG/creatinine ratio is an indirect measure of kidney levels of angiotensin II and is indicative of increased kidney injury. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to a lower UATG/creatinine ratio. • UATG/creatinine will be compared among the three groups as follows: Value at 3, 5, and 10 years Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: UATG will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in serum LDL cholesterol level during follow up
Higher serum LDL cholesterol levels (mg/dl) are an indicator of increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The investigators hypothesize that F+V leads to lower LDL cholesterol than that done with either NaHCO3 or Usual Care. Comparisons among the three groups will be done as follows: 1. level at 3, 5, and 10 years 2. Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, 10 years
Time frame: Serum LDL cholesterol will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in serum HDL cholesterol level during follow up
Higher serum HDL cholesterol levels (mg/dl) are an indicator of decreased CVD risk. The investigators hypothesize that F+V leads to higher HDL cholesterol than that done with either NaHCO3 or Usual Care. Comparisons among the three groups will be done as follows: 1. level at 3, 5, and 10 years 2. Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Serum HDL cholesterol will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in serum Lp(a) cholesterol level during follow up
Higher serum Lp(a) cholesterol levels (mg/dl) are an indicator of higher CVD risk. The investigators hypothesize that F+V leads to lower Lp(a) cholesterol than either NaHCO3 or Usual Care. Comparisons among the three groups will be done as follows: 1. level at 3, 5, and 10 years 2. Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Serum Lp(a) cholesterol will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in urine isoprostane 8-isoprostaglandin F2α excretion follow up
Higher urine excretion of isoprostane 8-isoprostaglandin F2α (U8-iso) is an indicator of increased oxidative stress which contributes to increased CVD risk. It will be measured as 8-iso (ug)-to-creatinine (g) ratio in a "spot" urine. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 lead to a lower urine 8-iso/creatinine ratio. Comparisons among the three groups will be done as follows: 1. level at 3, 5, and 10 years 2. Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Urine Isoprostane 8-isoprostaglandin F2α to creatinine ratio will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years.]
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Difference in change in plasma pH during follow up
Plasma pH (pH is expressed numerically without units) will be measured with standard blood gas machine techniques. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to higher values for plasma pH. Comparisons among the three groups will be as follows: * Levels at 3, 5, and 10 years * Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Plasma pH will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in plasma partial pressure of carbon dioxide gas (PCO2) during follow up
Plasma PCO2 \[millimeter (mm) mercury (Hg)\], will be measured with standard blood gas machine techniques. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to higher values for plasma PCO2. Comparisons among the three groups will be as follows: * Levels at 3, 5, and 10 years * Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Plasma PCO2 will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in plasma bicarbonate concentration (HCO3-]) during follow up
Plasma \[HCO3-\] (mEq/l) will be calculated from measured values of plasma pH and plasma partial pressure of carbon dioxide gas (PCO2) with a conventional formula commonly used by clinical laboratories. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to higher values for plasma \[HCO3-\]. Comparisons among the three groups will be as follows: * Levels at 3, 5, and 10 years * Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Serum [HCO3-] will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years
Difference in change in plasma total CO2 (TCO2) during follow up
Plasma TCO2 \[millimolar (mM)\] will be measured by the PI as in previous studies using fluorimetry. This technique uses an enzymatic assay in which TCO2 reacts with phosphoenolpyruvate to form oxaloacetate, which is reduced to malate coupled with oxidation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide bound to hydrogen ion (NADH) to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide without hydrogen ion (NAD+). NADH fluoresces but NAD+ does not, allowing for quantitation of TCO2 as reduced fluorescence. This technique is more reproducible than the conventional one of measuring CO2 gas released upon addition of a strong acid. Measuring changes in plasma TCO2 will help assess the effect(s) of dietary acid reduction among the three groups. The investigators hypothesize that F+V or NaHCO3 will lead to higher values for plasma TCO2. Comparisons among the three groups will be as follows: * Levels at 3, 5, and 10 years * Net change compared to baseline at 3, 5, and 10 years
Time frame: Plasma TCO2 will be measured at baseline and yearly for 10 years