This randomized clinical trial (RCT) will investigate novel approaches to enhance effectiveness, engagement, reach, and cost-effectiveness of medically tailored meals (MTM) programs for promoting cardiovascular health, focusing on economically disadvantaged New York City neighborhoods with a disparate burden of multiple cardiometabolic diseases. The main questions the RCT aims to answer are: 1. Does enhancing MTM programs, with culturally relevant cardiovascular health curriculum (including educational sessions on heart health, healthy diet, cooking demonstrations, recipes, gift bags with healthy ingredients and fresh produce, and addressing social needs) enhance program engagement and effectiveness in improving short-term healthy eating behaviors and clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure) among individuals with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who currently qualify for MTM programs? 2. Is the MTM program coupled with the cardiovascular health curriculum effective for improving healthy eating behaviors and clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure) among individuals with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who do not currently qualify for MTM programs and is a gradual reduction of MTM dosing an effective and sustainable approach for expanding reach of these programs? To answer question 1, 60 participants with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who currently qualify for MTM programs will be randomized into a group that receives the standard MTM program (10 MTMs/week for 8 months) or a group that receives the standard program plus the cardiovascular health curriculum. To answer question 2, 100 participants with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who do not currently qualify for MTM programs (due to not having advanced disease with complications) will be randomized into a group that receives the standard MTM program (10 MTMs/week for 8 months) plus the cardiovascular health curriculum or a group that receives standard MTM program for the first 3 months followed by a gradual reduction in dosing of the MTMs by 50% over the remaining 5 months plus the CVH curriculum. All participants will have their HbA1c and blood pressure measured and complete questionnaires about their diet quality, health and lifestyle behaviors, and program engagement and implementation at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months.
Medically tailored meals (MTMs) represent an integral in-kind intervention of the Food Is Medicine (FIM) initiative aimed at providing healthy food in a way that is integrated with the health care sector to prevent and manage chronic disease. MTMs are a promising approach to address diet-related cardiovascular inequities, because they collectively address food and nutrition insecurity, severe illness or chronic cardiometabolic disease, and challenges with activities of daily living such as shopping for or preparing meals in those with complex medical conditions. However, additional research is needed to determine how MTM programs could be enhanced to become more culturally and contextually responsive, increase engagement with these programs, enhance their effectiveness and sustainability, and expand their reach.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of weekly home-delivered MTMs and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period. The Food is Medicine Coalition Clinical Committee establishes and regularly updates the MTM Nutrition Standards, which catalogue the nutrition quality of this evidence-based intervention. Arms 1-3 will receive 10 MTMs per week for 8 months. Arm 4 will receive a distinct dosing down approach as follows: 10 MTMs/week in months 1-3, 9 MTMs/week in month 4, 8 MTMs/week in month 5, 7 MTMs/week in month 6, 6 MTMs/week in month 7, and 5 MTMs/week in month 8.
Culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program that consists of didactic sessions focused on lifestyle change and the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework, setting weekly specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals for health behavior modification, group coaching, cooking demonstrations, recipes and gift bags with healthy ingredients and fresh produce, and addressing social needs.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITINGChange in Diet Quality
The Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans (MEPA) scale, which captures adherence to a heart healthy dietary pattern, will be used to assess diet quality. The MEPA score ranges from 0-16 with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The change in MEPA scores from baseline to 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline to 8 months
Mean Diet Quality
The Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans (MEPA) scale, which captures adherence to a heart healthy dietary pattern, will be used to assess diet quality. The MEPA score ranges from 0-16 with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The mean MEPA scores at 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline to 8 months
Change in Diet Quality (Interim Change at 3 months)
The Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans (MEPA) scale, which captures adherence to a heart healthy dietary pattern, will be used to assess diet quality. The MEPA score ranges from 0-16 with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The change in MEPA scores from baseline to 3 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
Mean Diet Quality (Interim at 3 months)
The Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans (MEPA) scale, which captures adherence to a heart healthy dietary pattern, will be used to assess diet quality. The MEPA score ranges from 0-16 with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The mean MEPA scores at 3 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
Change in HbA1c
A fast and accurate HbA1c fingerstick test will assess changes in glycemic control from baseline to 3 months and 8 months (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean HbA1c
A fast and accurate HbA1c fingerstick test will assess glycemic control and mean HbA1c will be compared at 3 months and 8 months (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Change in systolic blood pressure
The change office systolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to follow-up at 3 months and 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure
The change office diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to follow-up at 3 months and 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean systolic blood pressure
Mean office systolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 3 months (mid-trial) and 8-months of follow-up (end of trial) calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean diastolic blood pressure
Mean office diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 3 months (mid-trial) and 8-months of follow-up (end of trial) calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Acceptability of Implementation
Acceptability will be measured by questionnaire. Items are adapted from the validated Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better intervention acceptability. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
Time frame: 8 months
Feasibility of Implementation
Feasibility will be measured by questionnaire using items adapted from the validated Feasibility of Implementation Measure (FIM) and rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better feasibility. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
Time frame: 8 months
Appropriateness of Implementation
Appropriateness will be measured by questionnaire. Items are adapted from the validated Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better appropriateness. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
Time frame: 8 months
Satisfaction with Intervention
Satisfaction with the intervention components will be measured by questionnaire. Participants will rate their satisfaction with intervention by indicating how likely they are to recommend it to others on a 10-point scale with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. They will also be asked to rate the quality of the intervention as poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
Time frame: 8 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.