This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) complicated by sepsis. The focus is on assessing the impact of the cytokine adsorption column(CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on survival rates, inflammation markers, and organ function to determine its potential value in clinical practice. The primary research questions are: (1) Does DPCAS+LPE artificial liver therapy improve the 4-week mortality rate in ACLF patients with sepsis? (2) Does it improve the 12-week mortality rate in these patients? Additionally, the study examines the effects of this therapy on APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, vasoactive-inotropic score, MELD scores, and COSSH-ACLF II scores, as well as the cytokine adsorption efficiency of the CA280. Patients were randomly assigned to either the DPCAS+LPE group or the plasma exchange(PE) group. All patients received artificial liver therapy every other day, for a total of two sessions. Follow-up assessments were conducted before and after each therapy session, as well as at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
192
Both groups received comprehensive medical treatment, including antiviral therapy, anti-infection treatment, supportive care, symptomatic treatment, and prevention of complications. All patients will initiate ALSS within 48 hours of enrollment, with treatment administered every other day, for a total of three sessions. The experimental group: The first two sessions consisted of a double plasma cytokine adsorption system with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (DPCAS+LPE). This involved using a cytokine adsorption column (CA280,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) and a bilirubin adsorption device (BS330,Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China) on the same treatment circuit. DPCAS treatment was performed first, with an adsorption volume of 4500ml to 5000ml over 2 to 3 hours, followed by plasma exchange (PE), with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin being infused. The third treatment was plasma exchange, with the same dosing as in the control group.
Based on comprehensive medical treatment, the control group received plasma exchange(PE) treatment, where whole blood was processed through a plasma separator (MICROPLAS MPS 07, BELLCO S.R.L., Italy), with a portion of the plasma discarded and replaced with 1000ml of plasma and 500ml of 4% albumin.Three sessions of plasma exchange (PE) performed every other day.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGMortality rate
4-week mortality rate
Time frame: 4 weeks
Mortality rate
12-week Mortality rate
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score from baseline
The theoretical maximum value of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score(APACHE II score) was 71 points. The higher the score, the higher the risk of death. Patients with more than 15 points were classified as severe, and patients with less than 15 points were classified as non-severe.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks
Changes in sequential organ failure assessment score from baseline
The theoretical value range of sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA) score is 6-24. The higher the score, the worse the prognosis.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks
Changes in vasoactive-inotropic score from baseline
Vasoactive-Inotropic Score ( VIS ) evaluates cardiac function and the intensity of vasoactive drug therapy in critically ill patients by quantifying the dose of vasoactive and inotropic drugs received by patients. VIS has no special value range. The higher the score, the higher the patient 's dependence on vasoactive drugs.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks
Changes in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score from baseline
MELD score is now widely used in the prioritization of liver transplantation candidates in many countries. The score range is usually between 6 ( low risk ) and 40 ( high risk ).
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks
Changes in COSSH-ACLF II score from baseline
COSSH-ACLF II is a prognostic scoring system for hepatitis B virus -related acute-on-chronic liver failure(HBV-ACLF). COSSH-ACLF IIs can significantly divide ACLF patients into three risk groups based on two cutoff values of 7.4 and 8.4 : low-risk group ( \< 7.4 points ), medium-risk group ( 7.4-8.4 points ) and high-risk group ( ≥ 8.4 points ).
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks
Adsorption rates of various cytokines
Adsorption rates of various cytokines (including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines) after each treatment
Time frame: Day1
Adsorption rates of lactate
Adsorption rates of lactate after each treatment
Time frame: Day1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.