Analysis of Various Treatment Methods of Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis

Overview

Granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM) is a rare benign breast disease that is difficult to distinguish from breast cancer based on clinical and imaging findings, and there is currently no standard treatment. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics and demographic data of GLM patients and to compare the overall effectiveness of three treatment methods: surgery alone, triple anti-tuberculosis drug therapy alone, and combined surgery with triple anti-tuberculosis drug therapy, with the goal of providing new insights for clinical treatment.

In recent years, the incidence of this disease has been increasing annually. The incidence of GLM is region-specific, being higher in Mediterranean regions and Asian countries. The etiology is currently unclear, but many studies suggest that GLM is associated with autoimmune disorders, hormonal imbalances, and microbial infections . GLM has a long course, is difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence, causing significant trauma to the patient's breast appearance and overall well-being. Currently, the main treatment methods for GLM include surgical treatment, drug therapy, combined surgery with drug therapy, and close observation. Surgical treatment options mainly include abscess incision and drainage, segmental resection, subcutaneous mastectomy, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Although surgical treatment can rapidly improve the condition, the recurrence rate reported in the literature ranges from 5% to 50% . Although GLM is a benign disease, it can severely impact the patient's normal life, causing physical and psychological trauma. However, few studies have included patients' subjective treatment experiences in the evaluation of treatment outcomes. To date, there have been no studies comparing the efficacy of three treatment methods (surgery alone, triple anti-tuberculosis drug therapy alone, and combined surgery with triple anti-tuberculosis drug therapy) in the same population of GLM patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy and patient satisfaction of these three treatment methods, with the hope of providing new insights for clinical treatment options.

Conditions