Relative Bioavailability of Two Orally Administered CBD Formulations in Healthy Male Adults

Phase 1RecruitingNCT06574100

University of Saskatchewan20 enrolled

Overview

This project is aimed at understanding whether a new fast-dissolving cheek-administered cannabidiol strip will be absorbed better into the body than cannabidiol powder. The results of this study will help guide dosage formulation choices as well as dosing regimens in NFL athletes for concussion management.

Cannabis formulations are typically administered by the oral route of administration. This route represents the most common administration route for most pharmaceuticals due to the ease of administration and convenience. Inhalational products are not acceptable for the sport's athlete population due to potential damage to lung tissues. Topical products do not have adequate bioavailability to meet our therapeutic objectives. Our PK studies, then, need to employ the same dosage form and route of administration we expect to use in future clinical efficacy trials. Given the low bioavailability expected with CBD oral formulations, we wish to assess two different formulations and the relative extent of CBD absorption. Our future planned CBD intervention studies in athletes will require use of larger doses of CBD. The formulation with the larger bioavailability will help to reduce the overall size of the dose utilized and therefore reduce the amount of product exposure in our clinical intervention studies. This will increase the likelihood that a Cannabis company can supply the necessary amount of product and reduce the overall cost associated with the studies. Generally speaking, based on current literature published around CBD administration for therapeutic application, higher doses of CBD (i.e., 50mg/kg/d) were found to correlate to more positive outcomes than lower doses (i.e., 1mg/kg/d). Assuming an average weight of 70 kg, a 1000 mg dose would be around 14.29 mg/kg, and a 3000 mg dose around 42.86 mg/kg. This will allow us to investigate the pharmacokinetics of CBD on both ends of the hypothetical efficacy trend. Studies have examined single orally administered doses up to 6000 mg with no serious adverse effects reported.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Pharmacokinetics

Interventions

CannabidiolDRUG

Patients in the first arm cross-over will receive either a single bolus dose of 250mg buccally administered or 1000mg CBD powder and cross over to vice-versa after 21 days.

CannabidiolDRUG

Patients will be randomised to receive 3000mg oral CBD fasting or Fed, they will the cross over to the other group 21 days following the first administration.

Eligibility

Sex: MALEMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 35 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 - 35 years old 2. Clinical labs within the stated normal range of the Royal University Hospital Test Centre, or values outside the stated normal range that are not of clinical significance as determined by the qualified investigator. 3. No clinically significant disease on medical history or clinically significant findings on physical examination including vital signs as determined by the qualified investigator. 4. Ability to stay in the clinic trial unit for 13 hours on the day of each single oral dose. 5. Ability to return for blood draws in the subsequent days. Exclusion Criteria: 1. History or presence of significant gastrointestinal, liver or kidney disease or any other condition known to interfere with drug pharmacokinetics including bioavailability or increase risk of adverse effects. 2. History or presence of serious cardiovascular disease, such as ischaemic heart disease, arrhythmias, poorly controlled hypertension or severe heart failure 3. Males whose partners are trying to conceive (i.e. male subjects intending to start a family during the study period) 4. Lack of medically acceptable contraception by participants whose female partners have childbearing potential for the duration of the study. 5. Personal or family history of schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder 6. Current or past drug or alcohol dependence or abuse 7. Use of Cannabis-based therapy within 2 months (Participants who have previously used a Cannabis-based therapy may be included if they have a 2-month period without use of Cannabis-based therapy prior to enrolment in the study) 8. Use of recreational Cannabis within 2 months (Participants who have previously used recreational Cannabis may be included if they have a 2-month period without use of recreational Cannabis prior to enrolment in the study) 9. Use of psychotropic medications with serotonergic activity (e.g. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Tricyclic Antidepressants, Atypical Neuroleptics) within one week 10. Use of narcotic medications (e.g. Codeine, Morphine, Oxycontin) within one week 11. Use of any other medication known to interact with medicinal Cannabis within one week. 12. Allergy or known intolerance to any of the compounds within the study preparation. 13. Resting heart rate HR \< 50 bpm or \> 100 bpm or seated blood pressure \< 100/60 or higher than 140/90 14. Inability of study participants to attend and complete all study visits 15. Bleeding disorder 16. Known low hematocrit

Locations (1)

University of Saskatchewan

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

relative bioavailability (F)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

log-linear terminal phase rate constant (k)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

absorption rate constant (ka)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

apparent clearance (Cl/F)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Pharmacokinetic Parameters

apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F)

Central Contacts

Abdul Salama, PharmD

CONTACT

3065600094 abs915@usask.ca

Jane Alcorn, DVM;PhD

CONTACT

(306) 966-6365 jane.alcorn@usask.ca

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Secondary Outcomes

Safety of the drug using the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1)

Safety of the study drug will be determined by measuring blood pressure (mmhg)

Time frame: During the first week of administration and the 4th week of administration

Safety of the drug using the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1)

Safety of the study drug will be determined by measuring heart rate (beats/minute)

Time frame: During the first week of administration and the 4th week of administration

Safety of the drug using the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1)

Safety will be assessed by reporting of incidence of adverse events for each participant.

Time frame: During the first week of administration and the 4th week of administration

Optimal washout periods

Measure CBD and it's metabolites over the course of the study to determine what the optimal washout period is for future studies

Time frame: 3 weeks

Tolerability of the drug using the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1)

Tolerability of the study drug will be determined by reporting of incidence of adverse events for each participant.

Time frame: During the first week of administration and the 4th week of administration

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

half-life

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

apparent clearance (Cl/F)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

absorption rate constant (ka)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

log-linear terminal phase rate constant (k)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over

Compare Fed vs Fast state on oral absorption kinetics

relative bioavailability (F)

Time frame: 1 week of samples will be collected. 2 week washout. Then another week of samples after cross over