The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new HA filler for nasolabial fold correction
A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of new HA filler versus Juvederm for nasolabial fold correction
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
74
Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.
Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, South Korea
WSRS
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale from 1 (no visible fold) to 5 (extremely deep and long folds)
Time frame: at 24 weeks after treatment
GAIS
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale from 3 (very much improved) to -1 (worse).
Time frame: at 24 weeks after treatment
Adverse events related to the procedure
Patients were required to report any adverse events up to 24 weeks
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.