Because of the important role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of SAH, it was hypothesized that its pharmacological manipulation might improve the prognosis of patients. In recent years, the effects of several groups of anti-inflammatory drugs on the development of complications after SAH have been described. Initially promising, glucocorticoids, thought to reduce cerebrovascular inflammation, brain swelling, and headache, failed in clinical trials. Studies have not provided clear evidence of the beneficial effects of these drugs in patients after SAH. Therefore, the administration of glucocorticoids is not currently part of the recommended practice. In addition, glucocorticoid treatment is associated with adverse effects that worsen outcomes, including hyperglycemia, infection, and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a specific type of hemorrhagic stroke with a worldwide incidence ranging from 0.5 to 28 per 100,000 population, with large regional variations. Despite improvements in diagnosis, treatment and care, SAH remains a disease with high mortality and morbidity. According to the literature, one third of patients die within the first few days after SAH, and most survivors have cognitive impairment or long-term disability. The overall clinical outcome depends on the severity of early brain injury (EBI), cerebral edema, hydrocephalus, development of delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND), epileptic seizures, and other complications. The pathophysiological cascades responsible for the development of these complications remain poorly understood. However, numerous studies support the important role of aseptic cerebrovascular inflammation induced by blood and blood breakdown products in the subarachnoid space after SAH. The increased interest in the development of cerebrovascular inflammation after SAH is confirmed by the increasing number of clinical and experimental studies devoted to this topic. Cerebrovascular aseptic inflammation as a potential treatment target is also mentioned in current guidelines for the management of patients after SAH. The results of experimental studies formed the basis for the clinical evaluation of the effects of NSAIDs after SAH. The effects of several commonly used NSAIDs, particularly dexketoprofen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, indomethacin, or dipyrone, have been evaluated in prospective and retrospective clinical trials over the past decade. In addition to reducing pro-inflammatory markers such as IL6, lowering body temperature and platelet aggregation, the administration of NSAIDs has been associated with reduced mortality and improved clinical outcomes. Despite the beneficial effects of some NSAIDs, more robust studies are still lacking, except for one study that evaluated the effect of meloxicam in patients after SAH. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. It showed a trend towards a better outcome with a lower incidence of vasospasm or mortality in patients after SAH. Despite encouraging experimental results, no clinical trials have yet evaluated the anti-inflammatory and other potentially beneficial effects of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. COX-2 inhibitors, or coxibs, belong to the group of NSAIDs that selectively inhibit the COX-2 enzyme, which is responsible for developing inflammation and pain. A planned clinical study will evaluate the effects of parecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor in the NSAIDs group, on overall clinical outcome and development of complications in patients following spontaneous SAH.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
112
Parecoxib (Dynastat) 40 mg solution for injection is for intravenous administration. Parecoxib may be given as an intravenous injection for 30 minutes directly into a vein or through an intravenous infusion set.
Placebo intravenous injection can be administered quickly and directly into a vein or through an intravenous infusion set.
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno
Brno, Czech Republic, Czechia
Influence of parecoxib on outcome of patients with SAH
The primary outcome measure is the percentage of patients in the active and control groups whose outcome is categorized as favorable (mRS 0-3) or unfavorable (mRS 4-6) according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
Time frame: 180 days ± 14 days after first dose of parecoxib/placebo
Influence of parecoxib on outcome of patients with SAH
The secondary monitored parameter is the percentage of patients in the active and control groups whose outcome, according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS), is divided into favourable (mRS 0-3) or unfavourable (mRS 4-6).
Time frame: Discharge from hospital and 90 days ± 7 days after first dose of parecoxib/placebo
Occurrence of symptomatic vasospasms (vasospasms confirmed on TCD / CT AG / MR AG / DSA
Number of patients with vasospasms confirmed on TCD / CT AG / MR AG / DSA
Time frame: Six, eight and ten days after the application of the first dose of the evaluated medicinal product /placebo.
Incidence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND)
Number of patients with delayed ischemic neurological deficit
Time frame: Six, eight and ten days, three and six months after the application of the first dose of the evaluated medicinal product /placebo.
Mortality
Number of deaths
Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization, 90 days ± 7 days and 180 days ± 14 days
Length of hospitalization in ICU
Length of hospitalization in ICU
Time frame: 3 months
Total length of hospitalization
Total length of hospitalization
Time frame: 3 months
Occurrence of acute hydrocephalus
Number of patients with acute hydrocephalus
Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization
Occurrence of chronic hydrocephalus
Number of patients with chronic hydrocephalus with V-P shunt implantation
Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization, 90 days ± 7 days, 180 days ± 14 days
Occurrence of fevers
Number of patients with fever above 38 degrees Celsius
Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization
Occurrence of inflammation
Evaluation of the systemic inflammatory response (assessed daily during hospitalization) meeting at least 2 parameters: * heart rate \> 90/min. * leukocytosis \> 12x109/l) or leukopenia \< 9x109 * respiratory rate \> 20/min. or PaCO2 \< 32 mm Hg (4.3 kPa) * body temperature \< 36.0 °C or \> 38.0 °C
Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization
Evaluation of pain according to Visual Analogue Scale
The comparison of the patients in the treatment and placebo arm with pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale, a numerical scale from 0 to 10 points, where increasing pain is indicated by a higher score.
Time frame: During the treatment and post treatment period of hospitalization, discharge from hospital, 90 days ± 7 days and 180 days ± 14 days after first dose of parecoxib/placebo
Evaluation of prostaglandins and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid in the case of the below-mentioned external ventricular drainage after 2 days and in the serum
Evaluation of prostaglandins (COX-2, PGH2, PGI2, PGE2, PGD2, PF2a, TXA2) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12) in the cerebrospinal fluid in the case of the below-mentioned external ventricular drainage after 2 days and in the serum regardless of the established cerebrospinal fluid drainage after two days to day 10 from initial symptoms
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days after implantation of drainage
Evaluatioon of laboratory markers of inflammatory response in peripheral blood
C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and white blood cell count
Time frame: Two, four, six, eight and ten days after the application of the first dose parecoxib/placebo
Evaluation of the functionality of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier every 2 days if cerebrospinal fluid drainage is necessary.
This evaluation will compare the number of patients in the treatment and placebo arms who undergo cerebrospinal fluid drainage.
Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days after implantation of drainage
Quality of life measured through questionnaires
Evaluation of quality of life (SF-36 score)
Time frame: Discharge from hospital, 90 days ± 7 days and 180 days ± 14 days after the application of the first dose parecoxib/placebo
Evaluation of the difference in efficacy parameters between subgroups according to the source of bleeding
Number of patients with inflamation based on source of bleeding
Time frame: After discharge from hospital, six days after administration of the 1st dose of parecoxib/placebo
Serious adverse events
Percentage of patients in the experimental and placebo groups with the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE) (assessed during hospitalization, at discharge, 3 and 6 months after the first dose) supplemented by evaluation in individual subgroups according to the source of bleeding.
Time frame: During hospitalization, at discharge, 90 days ± 7 days, 180 days ± 14 days after the first dose of parecoxib/placebo
Hepatotoxicity
Percentage of patients in the experimental and placebo groups with an increase in blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK), an increase in blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), an increase in alanine transaminase (ALT), an increase in aspartate transaminase (AST), and an increase in blood urea level \> 5x ULN; separate analysis for subgroups by source of bleeding.
Time frame: Before the 1st dose of parecoxib/placebo, 1., 3. and 5. day of treatment and 10. day of hospitalization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.