New sustainable models of patient-focused and team-based care for patients with hypertension should be developed to achieve health improvements and cost-efficiency. The aim of this project is to evaluate new ways of sustainable hypertension (HT) management in primary care, starting with a pilot study at 2 Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs). At intervention PHCCs cardiovascular risk is assessed with SCORE2 for all hypertension patients. The staff receives education on HT treatment and an easy-to-follow treatment protocol. Non-physicians lead patient education on HT in groups. Patients receive a home blood pressure (BP) monitor and communicate digitally with the assigned nurse on medication update, blood and urinary tests and follow up. The nurse consults with the physician if needed. Regular face to face visits with the physician are only scheduled for patients with high cardiovascular risk or end organ damage, otherwise for all patients if needed. At the control PHCs hypertension care continues as usual. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaires after 6 and 24 months. Outcomes are feasibility for the pilot study and the proportion of patients reaching BP target plus change in systolic BP, cardiovascular risk factors, patients´ and staff´s grade of satisfaction and knowledge, and health care costs for the main study, compared between intervention and control PHCCS. Results will help to establish sustainable models of treating HT patients in Primary Care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
500
Hypertension management based on cardiovascular risk assessment. For details see description of study arm intervention.
Hypertension Management as usual
Husensjö Primary Health Care Center
Helsingborg, Sweden
RECRUITINGBlood pressure change
change in proportion of patients reaching blood pressure target of \<140/90 mmHg
Time frame: 6 months
Blood pressure change
change in proportion of patients reaching blood pressure target of \<140/90 mmHg
Time frame: 24 months
Health economic evaluation
Estimation of the ICER values (cost per unit of effect). Calculation of QALY, based on EQ5D (questionnaires). Comparison of ICER per QALY with values from the National Board of Health and Welfare
Time frame: 24 months
Participants grade of satisfaction
Questionnaires. 7 point Likert Scale: Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 1. \- Completely dissatisfied 2. \- Mostly dissatisfied 3. \- Somewhat dissatisfied 4. \- neither satisfied or dissatisfied 5. \- Somewhat satisfied 6. \- Mostly satisfied 7. \- Completely satisfied
Time frame: 24 months
Staffs grade of satisfaction
Questionnaires. 7 point Likert Scale: Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 1. \- Completely dissatisfied 2. \- Mostly dissatisfied 3. \- Somewhat dissatisfied 4. \- neither satisfied or dissatisfied 5. \- Somewhat satisfied 6. \- Mostly satisfied 7. \- Completely satisfied
Time frame: 24 months
Blood glucose level and cholesterol
Change in mean blood glucose level (mmol/l), mean LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l), mean HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)
Time frame: 24 months
Kidney function
Change in mean eGFR (ml/min/1,73 m2)
Time frame: 24 months
Kidney complications
Change in % of patients with microalbuminuria (U-albumin/kreatinin-kvot (mg/mmol) 3,0-30)
Time frame: 24 months
Smoking
Change in % of patients who smoke)
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.