Background: Gastric electrical stimulation applied by a surgically implanted device effectively alleviates upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the majority of individuals with medically refractory gastroparesis. Despite its efficacy, the mechanisms of action have been minimally explored in previous studies, and it is unknown why some individuals experience limited symptom-lowering effects. Aim: The investigators aim to investigate two of the potential mechanisms of action leading to symptom-reducing effects of gastric electrical stimulation: 1) possible central effects in the brainstem and brain by enhanced parasympathetic vagal activity, and 2) peripheral effects in the stomach by improved gastric accommodation. Methods: Up to thirty individuals with drug-refractory gastroparesis having an implanted gastric electrical stimulator will be enrolled in this cross-sectional and observational study. Of these, 15 will be responders (substantial symptomatic improvement) and 15 non-responders (minor symptomatic improvement). Electroencephalography (EEG) will evaluate the stimulation-induced activity in the brain and brainstem to assess whether the gastric stimulation generates evoked potentials. Electrocardiography (ECG) will investigate stimulation-induced changes in the autonomic regulation of the heart. Gastric ultrasound will investigate the effect of stimulation on stomach accommodation, contractions, and wall tension. These central and peripheral measures will be assessed during one study day before and after activating the gastric electrical stimulator, following an increase in stimulation intensity and post-meal consumption. Furthermore, results will be compared between responders and non-responders. Perspectives: Adjusting the parameters of gastric electrical stimulation based on objective markers in the brain, heart, or stomach, rather than relying on symptom fluctuations, may enhance the effectiveness of symptom improvement. In the future, these objective markers may aid in differentiating between responders and non-responders, which may lead to optimised selection criteria for surgery.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
30
Measuring EEG, ECG, and ultrasound in both groups during different stimulation intensities provided by the previously implanted gastric electrical stimulator.
Department of hepatology and gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus N, Denmark
RECRUITINGEvoked brain potentials
Amplitude of evoked brain potentials induced by gastric electrical stimulation
Time frame: 5min during maximum stimulation intensity
EEG measures between ON/OFF stimulation
EEG frequency distribution when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes
Time frame: 5min
Meal-related EEG measures
EEG frequency distribution in response to an ingested meal when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes.
Time frame: 5min
ECG measures between ON/OFF stimulation
Heart rate variability, periodic repolarisation dynamic, and the deceleration capacity of the heart rate when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes.
Time frame: 5min
ECG measures between stimulation intensities
Heart rate variability, periodic repolarisation dynamic, and the deceleration capacity of the heart rate following different stimulation intensities.
Time frame: 5min
Meal-related ECG measures
Heart rate variability, periodic repolarisation dynamic, and the deceleration capacity of the heart rate in response to an ingested meal when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes.
Time frame: 5min
Meal-related gastric accomodation
Gastric accommodation in response to an ingested meal comparing OFF and ON stimulation.
Time frame: 5min
Meal-related gastric tension
Gastric tension in response to an ingested meal comparing OFF and ON stimulation.
Time frame: 5min
Meal-related gastric contraction frequency
Gastric contraction frequency in response to an ingested meal comparing OFF and ON stimulation.
Time frame: 5min
Symptoms and gastric measures
Correlation between gastroparesis symptoms (Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index) and changes in gastric accommodation/tension when turning the stimulation ON after meal ingestion.
Time frame: 5min
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.