The global cost of dementia is over 818 billion, and a further rise is expected in the next decade. While family caregiving is the backbone of the formal care service, promoting "living well with dementia" needs to extend to a dyadic perspective to address the needs of persons with dementia and their caregivers. Unique to dementia caregiving, imbalanced exchange in the assistance, interaction, relationship and autonomy between the partners in a care dyad always challenges their social interaction and relationships. Such eroding dyadic dynamics not only worsens the mental health of caregivers, but also compromises the quality of caregiving, fosters more dementia deterioration, and eventually complicates the caregiving process. Nevertheless, least attention is directed to dyadic dynamics in promoting living well with dementia. Partner exercise is designed in a way which requires collaboration of two members to enable the workout of each other. In addition to the benefits of exercise on dementia symptom control and caregiver's stress management, partner exercise provides a meaningful encounter to encourage reciprocity, collaboration and relationship closeness within the care dyad. This study aims to examine whether a 16-week theory-based partner exercise, named as Buddy-Up Dyadic Physical Activity (BUDPA) program, can improve dyadic dynamics and health outcomes of care dyads of mild to early-moderate dementia. This sequential mixed-method study will recruit 111 care dyads from the elderly centers in Hong Kong. They will be randomized to receive the enhanced BUDPA program or usual care. The changes in the dyadic dynamics and health outcomes \[including symptom severity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of persons with dementia; and affect, positive aspects of caregiving and HRQL of family caregivers\] between the two study groups from baseline (T0) to 16-weeks after baseline (T1) upon completion of the training , and at 24-weeks after baseline (T2). Data from outcome evaluation and interviews will be integrated to solicit a thorough understanding on the impact of BUDPA. This study marks the first attempt to use theory-driven dyadic intervention to enhance the dyadic dynamics and health outcomes of dementia care dyads. The project will advance the dyadic science in a dementia caregiving context and inform the development of evidence-based care model in dyadic fashion to promote living well with dementia in a caregiving context.
The global cost of dementia is over 818 billion, and a further rise is expected in the next decade. While family caregiving is the backbone of the formal care service, promoting "living well with dementia" needs to extend to a dyadic perspective to address the needs of persons with dementia and their caregivers. Unique to dementia caregiving, imbalanced exchange in the assistance, interaction, relationship and autonomy between the partners in a care dyad always challenges their social interaction and relationships. Such eroding dyadic dynamics not only worsens the mental health of caregivers, but also compromises the quality of caregiving, fosters more dementia deterioration, and eventually complicates the caregiving process. Nevertheless, least attention is directed to dyadic dynamics in promoting living well with dementia. Partner exercise is designed in a way which requires collaboration of two members to enable the workout of each other. In addition to the benefits of exercise on dementia symptom control and caregiver's stress management, partner exercise provides a meaningful encounter to encourage reciprocity, collaboration and relationship closeness within the care dyad. This study aims to examine whether a 16-week theory-based partner exercise, named as Buddy-Up Dyadic Physical Activity (BUDPA) program, can improve dyadic dynamics and health outcomes of care dyads of mild to early-moderate dementia. This sequential mixed-method study will recruit 112 care dyads (people with Dementia (PwD) and family caregivers) from the elderly centers in Hong Kong. They will be randomized to receive the enhanced BUDPA program or usual care. Subject: For people with Dementia (PwD), the inclusion criteria are i) confirmed diagnosed of dementia ii) cognitive impairment as indicated by a Hong Kong-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Hong Kong version; HK-MoCA) score of 8-19 to indicate mild to early moderate dementia will be recruited For family caregivers, the inclusion criteria are i) live together with the PwD ii) identify as the primary family caregivers of the PwD The changes in the dyadic dynamics and health outcomes \[including symptom severity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of persons with dementia; and affect, positive aspects of caregiving and HRQL of family caregivers\] between the two study groups from baseline (T0) to 16-weeks after baseline (T1) upon completion of the training , and at 24-weeks after baseline (T2). 1. For Pwd, 4 scales will be used, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Color-Trails Test , Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease(QoL-AD), and The Dyadic Relationship Scale. 2. For family caregivers, measures the The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-C), The Neuro-psychiatric Inventory (NPI), The International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Short-Form (PANAS-SF 20 affect state), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), The Dyadic Relationship Scale, and Positive Aspect of Caregiving Scale (PAC). BUDPA program is an overall 16-week training which comprises three phases: the conditioning, consolidating and habituating phases. i) Conditioning Phase (1st - 4th week) is the preparatory phase to introduce exercise movements in group training. ii) Consolidating Phase (5th -12th week) is the training phase for group-based exercise. Each exercise training session will be followed by a 20-min debriefing and goal-setting session. Self-practice will be recorded on a simple logbook. iii) habituating phase (13th-16th week) aims at supporting the care dyad to integrate the partner exercises into their daily lifestyle. A video call meeting with the care dyad in week 13 and week 15 will be scheduled to offer the support. Data from outcome evaluation and interviews will be integrated to solicit a thorough understanding on the impact of BUDPA. This study marks the first attempt to use theory-driven dyadic intervention to enhance the dyadic dynamics and health outcomes of dementia care dyads. The project will advance the dyadic science in a dementia caregiving context and inform the development of evidence-based care model in dyadic fashion to promote living well with dementia in a caregiving context.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
222
BUDPA program is an overall 16-week training which comprises three phases: the conditioning, consolidating and habituating phases. i) Conditioning Phase (1st - 4th week) is the preparatory phase to introduce exercise movements in group training. ii) Consolidating Phase (5th -12th week) is the training phase for group-based exercise. Each exercise training session will be followed by a 20-min debriefing and goal-setting session. Self-practice will be recorded on a simple logbook. iii) Habituating phase (13th-16th week) aims at supporting the care dyad to integrate the partner exercises into their daily lifestyle. A video call meeting with the care dyad in week 13 and week 15 will be scheduled to offer the support.
Usual care group will be put on a waiting list to receive the intervention (BUDPA program) after 24-weeks (T2) the second evaluation timepoint.
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGAlzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
evaluate the cognitive domain function of the patient with dementia (PwD), scale from 0-70, with higher score indicating poor cognitive function.
Time frame: baseline (T0)
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
evaluate the cognitive domain function of the patient with dementia (PwD), scale from 0-70, with higher score indicating poor cognitive function.
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
evaluate the cognitive domain function of the patient with dementia (PwD), scale from 0-70, with higher score indicating poor cognitive function.
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
evaluate the health-related quality of life (HR) covering physical, functional, psychosocial, interpersonal, and environmental status of the patient with dementia, scales 13 to 52, with higher score indicating better HRQL
Time frame: baseline (T0)
Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
evaluate the health-related quality of life (HR) covering physical, functional, psychosocial, interpersonal, and environmental status of the patient with dementia, scales 13 to 52, with higher score indicating better HRQL
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
evaluate the health-related quality of life (HR) covering physical, functional, psychosocial, interpersonal, and environmental status of the patient with dementia, scales 13 to 52, with higher score indicating better HRQL
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
The Neuro-psychiatric Inventory (NPI)
evaluate the neuro-psychiatric symptoms of the patient with dementia reported by the caregiver, scales from 12 to 96 with higher scores indicating higher severity
Time frame: baseline (T0)
The Neuro-psychiatric Inventory (NPI)
evaluate the neuro-psychiatric symptoms of the patient with dementia reported by the caregiver, scales from 12 to 96 with higher scores indicating higher severity
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
The Neuro-psychiatric Inventory (NPI)
evaluate the neuro-psychiatric symptoms of the patient with dementia reported by the caregiver, scales from 12 to 96 with higher scores indicating higher severity
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
evaluate the perceived caregiving burden among the caregivers, scales from 0 to 88, with higher score indicating higher perceived burden of caregivers
Time frame: baseline (T0)
The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
evaluate the perceived caregiving burden among the caregivers, scales from 0 to 88, with higher score indicating higher perceived burden of caregivers
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
evaluate the perceived caregiving burden among the caregivers, scales from 0 to 88, with higher score indicating higher perceived burden of caregivers
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
The International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Short-Form (PNAS-SF)
evaluate caregiver's mood status, scales from 20 to 100, with higher score indicating higher mood change
Time frame: baseline (T0)
The International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Short-Form (PNAS-SF)
evaluate caregiver's mood status, scales from 20 to 100, with higher score indicating higher mood change
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
The International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Short-Form (PNAS-SF)
evaluate caregiver's mood status, scales from 20 to 100, with higher score indicating higher mood change
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
The Color-Trails Test (CTT)
evaluate the complex attention, executive functions and task switching for the patient with dementia, higher score indicating poor functions.
Time frame: baseline (T0)
The Color-Trails Test (CTT)
evaluate the complex attention, executive functions and task switching for the patient with dementia, higher score indicating poor functions.
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
The Color-Trails Test (CTT)
evaluate the complex attention, executive functions and task switching for the patient with dementia, higher score indicating poor functions.
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
The digit span-forward and backward test
evaluate the attention and working memory of the patient with dementia, scales from 10 to 56, with higher score indicating better attention and working memory function
Time frame: baseline (T0)
The digit span-forward and backward test
evaluate the attention and working memory of the patient with dementia, scales from 10 to 56, with higher score indicating better attention and working memory function
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
The digit span-forward and backward test
evaluate the attention and working memory of the patient with dementia, scales from 10 to 56, with higher score indicating better attention and working memory function
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
evaluates the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of the family caregiver, scales from 12 to 60, with higher score indicating better HRQL
Time frame: baseline (T0)
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
evaluates the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of the family caregiver, scales from 12 to 60, with higher score indicating better HRQL
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
evaluates the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of the family caregiver, scales from 12 to 60, with higher score indicating better HRQL
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
The Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS)
evaluate the dyadic dynamic in terms of negative relationship strain and positive interaction within the care dyad, scales from 11 to 44, with higher score indicating higher levels of dyadic strain
Time frame: baseline (T0)
The Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS)
evaluate the dyadic dynamic in terms of negative relationship strain and positive interaction within the care dyad, scales from 11 to 44, with higher score indicating higher levels of dyadic strain
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
The Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS)
evaluate the dyadic dynamic in terms of negative relationship strain and positive interaction within the care dyad, scales from 11 to 44, with higher score indicating higher levels of dyadic strain
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline
Positive Aspect of Caregiving Scale (PAC)
evaluate caregiver\'s gain in terms of self -affirmation and outlook on life, scales from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating more positive caregiving gain
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: baseline (T0)
Positive Aspect of Caregiving Scale (PAC)
evaluate caregiver\'s gain in terms of self -affirmation and outlook on life, scales from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating more positive caregiving gain
Time frame: 16-weeks (T1) after baseline
Positive Aspect of Caregiving Scale (PAC)
evaluate caregiver\'s gain in terms of self -affirmation and outlook on life, scales from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating more positive caregiving gain
Time frame: 24-weeks (T2) after baseline