To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the JenaValve Trilogy™ Heart Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (cfLVAD) and clinically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) who are indicated for TAVR
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
TAVR with JenaValve Trilogy Heart Valve System
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Sutter Health
San Francisco, California, United States
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Device Success
Freedom from unsuccessful delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
Time frame: 30 days
Device Positioning
Freedom from incorrect positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
Time frame: 30 days
Device Performance
Intended performance of the valve (i.e., no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)\*
Time frame: 30 days
Surgery/intervention related to device
Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device# or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
Time frame: 30 days
Bleeding
Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding
Time frame: 30 days
All Stroke
Number of patients that had stroke
Time frame: 30 days
Acute Kidney Injury
Number of patients that had acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 or 4
Time frame: 30 days
Total aortic regurgitation
Number of patients that had moderate or severe total aortic regurgitation
Time frame: 30 days
Major Vascular Complication
Number of patients that had major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Piedmont
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Washington University, St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
...and 4 more locations
Time frame: 30 days
Permanent pacemaker implantation
Number of patients that had these events
Time frame: 30 days
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality within the first 30 days post index procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Device Success
Freedom from unsuccessful delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Device Positioning
Freedom from incorrect positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Device Performance
Intended performance of the valve (i.e., no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)\*
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Surgery/intervention related to device
Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device# or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Bleeding
Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
All Stroke
Number of patients that had stroke
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Acute Kidney Injury
Number of patients that had acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 or 4
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Total aortic regurgitation
Number of patients that had moderate or severe total aortic regurgitation
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Major Vascular Complication
Number of patients that had major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Permanent pacemaker implantation
Number of patients that had these events
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality within the first 30 days post index procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year