Previous studies have shown that the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in the regulation of pain and its associated negative emotions, that pyramidal neurons are highly excitable in chronic neuropathic pain conditions, and that silencing of pyramidal neurons can eliminate pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracranial injection of GA (containing the hM4Di gene) in the anterior cingulate cortex in combination with oral clozapine for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain.
There is no effective treatment for refractory neuropathic pain, and this study aims to develop new treatments. Previous studies have shown that the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in the regulation of pain and its associated negative emotions, that pyramidal neurons are highly excitable in chronic neuropathic pain conditions, and that silencing of pyramidal neurons can eliminate pain. Animal studies have shown that inhibition of anterior cingulate cortex neurons using chemical genetics can effectively eliminate pain responses. Our team has obtained similar therapeutic effects with chemical genetics in mouse models of central pain, bone cancer pain, migraine, and nerve injury. In this study, a chemogenetic approach was used to express designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drug (hM4Di) in the anterior cingulate cortex, which binds to clozapine to inhibit neuronal excitability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracranial injection of GA (containing the hM4Di gene) in the anterior cingulate cortex in combination with oral clozapine for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
6
Patients were first given intracranial injections of GA and observed for 14-28 days, followed by a dose-climbing trial of clozapine medication, and finally, after the investigators had determined an effective dose of clozapine, the patients were given a fixed dose of clozapine orally for three months.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGIncidence and severity of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse events (SAE) as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Patient-Reported Adverse Events, Abnormalities on Physical Examination, and Abnormalities in Laboratory Tests
Time frame: up to 28 weeks
effectiveness: the degree of pain improvement was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS).
The degree of pain improvement was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS Score: i.e. Pain Scale Rating, which assesses the severity of pain using visual analogue methods. The scale uses a 10cm long straight line with '0' cm and '10' cm at each end, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating unbearable severe pain.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the pain improvement was assessed by Brief pain inventory (BPI) scale.
the pain improvement was assessed by Brief pain inventory (BPI) scale. BPI: Evaluates pain severity and functional interference. Part 1 (Severity): Current pain, average pain (24h), worst pain (24h), least pain (24h), pain relief from treatments. Part 2 (Interference): Impact on general activity, mood, walking ability, work, relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the degree of sleep quality improvement was assessed by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).
The degree of sleep quality improvement was assessed by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). ISI scale: 7 entries, each rated 0-4. The total score ranges from 0-28, and the higher the score the greater the severity of insomnia.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the sleep quality improvement was assessed by Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS).
the sleep quality improvement was assessed by Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS). DSIS: An 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Pain did not interfere with sleep") to 10 ("Pain completely interfered with sleep" \[inability to sleep due to pain\]). Subjects will recall sleep interference over the preceding 24 hours each morning and record scores.
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
effectiveness: the depression improvement was assessed by Hamilton depression (HAMD) scale.
The depression improvement was assessed by Hamilton depression (HAMD) scale. HAMD: 17-item version implemented in this protocol. Trained raters will conduct combined evaluations through structured interviews and behavioral observations.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the degree of depression improvement was assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).
The degree of depression improvement was assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).PHQ-9: Used to screen patients for depressive disorders. The PHQ-9 scale has 9 items, each of which is a 4-point scale from 0-3. According to the scale, the PHQ-9 score is divided into 5 groups: 0-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, and 20-27, corresponding to no, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the anxiety improvement was assessed by Hamilton anxiety (HAMA) scale.
The anxiety improvement was assessed by Hamilton anxiety (HAMA) scale. HAMA: 14-item clinician-administered scale recognized as a primary diagnostic tool for anxiety disorders according to the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders-3 (CCMD-3).
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the degree of anxiety improvement was assessed by Generalized Anxiexy Disorde-7 (GAD-9).
The degree of anxiety improvement was assessed by Generalized Anxiexy Disorde-7 (GAD-9). The GAD-7 is a widely used self-assessment scale for anxiety symptoms that has been used in recent years to screen not only for anxiety disorders, but also for panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The scale consists of 7 items that rate tension, uncontrollable worry, excessive worry, inability to relax, inability to sit still, irritability, and feelings of foreboding. The number of days in the last 2 weeks that the target symptom was present was assessed: 0 for no symptoms, 1 for a few days, 2 for more than half of the days, and 3 for almost every day. A total score of 5 to 9 is considered mild, 10 to 14 is moderate, and 15 to 21 is severe.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the degree of quality of life improvement was assessed by EuroQOL, 5 Domains, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L).
The degree of quality of life improvement was assessed by EuroQOL, 5 Domains, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L is a set of standardised scales to measure health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of two parts, the EQ-5D-5L Health Descriptor System and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L Health Descriptor System describes five dimensions: mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Comfort, Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension consists of five levels: 1 No difficulty, 2 Some difficulty, 3 Moderate difficulty, 4 Severe difficulty, and 5 Unable to perform/very severe difficulty. Responses to the five dimensions generate a five-digit code describing the state of health, with a state of health of 11111 indicating no problems on any of the five dimensions.The EQ-VAS records the self-assessed state of health on a vertical, visually analogue scale, with the ends of the scale labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
effectiveness: the quality of life improvement was assessed by Patient global impression of change (PGIC).
the quality of life improvement was assessed by Patient global impression of change (PGIC). PGIC: A 7-point scale assessing subjects' overall perception changes following treatment: 1 = Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 3 = Minimally improved; 4 = No change; 5 = Minimally worse; 6 = Much worse; 7 = Very much worse.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period
immunogenicity endpoint: AAV antibody titres
Use of specific antibodies for AAV antibody titre testing
Time frame: up to 28 weeks
Antigen-specific T-cell responses
Antigen-specific T-cell responses
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
Pharmacokinetic profile: Carrier genome levels in urine, blood, tears, nasal secretions
Carrier genome levels in urine, blood, tears, nasal secretions
Time frame: up to 28 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.