Quantitative Imaging of Cervical Spinal Structures - the DISC Pilot Study -

Overview

The aim of this study is to explore a multi-parametric quantitative MRI approach to measure cervical intervertebral discs, the spinal cord and its nerve roots in healthy participants and patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). CDDD is the consequence of degeneration of intervertebral discs and joints leading to symptoms of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or a combination of both. The incidence of symptomatic CDDD is rising with the aging population, and, consequently, a significant increase in surgeries for symptomatic CDDD is predicted in the upcoming years. However, the decision for- and optimal timing of surgery remain challenging. Currently, the decision for surgery in patients with symptomatic CDDD is related to symptoms, as well as position and size of disc herniation on conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). However, conventional MRI only enables qualitative morphological evaluation, leaving space for subjective individual interpretation. Also, disc herniations on conventional MRI are frequently found in asymptomatic individuals, while, in symptomatic individuals type and extent of disc herniation does not correlate to severity of symptoms. Altogether, the current standard using conventional MRI cannot optimally predict response to surgery for patients with symptomatic CDDD. The primary aim of this project is to investigate whether a combination of different quantitative imaging sequences can provide more detailed information on disc herniation related compression and potentially aid in determining more objective cut-offs to stage disc herniation in patients with symptomatic CDDD, as well as to analyze whether differences exist in quantitative imaging parameters of discs in healthy participants versus patients with symptomatic CDDD. These novel techniques are promising, as they are noninvasive and could potentially aid in determining objective cut-offs to stage disc herniation. Since no single measurement has been proven to be the golden standard in previous studies, it is likely that a combination of measurements is needed for clinical application

RATIONALE: Cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) is the consequence of degeneration of intervertebral discs and joints and can result in compression of the cervical nerve root leading to clinical symptoms of radiculopathy, compression of the spinal cord with symptoms of myelopathy, or a combination of both.The incidence of CDDD is rising with the aging population, and, consequently, a significant increase insurgeries for symptomatic CDDD is predicted in the upcoming years. As such, the decision for- and optimal timing of surgery remain challenging. Currently, the decision for surgery in patients with symptomatic CDDD is related to symptoms, as well as position and size of disc herniation on conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). However, conventional MRI only enables qualitative morphological evaluation, leaving space for subjective individual interpretation. Also, disc herniations on conventional MRI are frequently found in asymptomatic individuals, while, in symptomatic individuals type and extent of disc herniation does not correlate to severity of symptoms. Altogether, the current standard using conventional MRI cannot optimally predict response to surgery for patients with symptomatic CDDD. Quantitative imaging is rapidly being recognized as a supplement to conventional MRI and refers to the direct measurement of physical properties of tissue. These novel techniques are promising, as they are noninvasive and could potentially aid in determining objective cut-offs to stage disc herniation. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is one of the most studied quantitative techniques and allows for evaluation of microstructural changes. The DTI fractional anisotropy (FA) metric was demonstrated as valid biomarker for recovery after surgery in cervical myelopathy as well as surgical selection in lumbar radiculopathy. Moreover, recent introduction of zoomed-DTI (z-DTI) could lead to greater imaging accuracy while proven feasible in the cervical spine. Furthermore, the cervical spinal cord and its nerve roots are highly vascularized and their perfusion could be compromised by disc-herniation related compression. Using the endogenous perfusion technique arterial spin labeling (ASL), as well as contrast-based perfusion techniques such as susceptibility contrast (DSC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), degree of ischemia, hypoxia as well as signal enhancement can be estimated. ASL has been studied twice for spinal cord perfusion mapping and DSC was demonstrated feasible in the spine of healthy participants as well as patients with cervical myelopathy. Additionally, increased signal enhancement was observed for DCE in degenerative discs of the lumbar spine. To our best knowledge, no studies have been conducted to assess perfusion of the cervical nerve roots, which are compromised in cervical radiculopathy due to CDDD. Besides microstructure and perfusion, viscoelastic properties of cervical spinal structures may change in relation to disc herniation-related compression. Therefore, it would be interesting to study mechanical properties such as stiffness and viscosity, which can be measured with Tomo-MRElastography (TMRE). To our best knowledge, no previous study has assessed cervical intervertebral discs and spinal structures using TMRE, making this a promising first study. Finally, imaging is a relatively time-consuming matter, and including additional sequences will only increase its lengthiness. Therefore, several methods are being developed to perform imaging in a more efficient manner. One novel method is Synthetic MRI (SyMRI). Advantages of SyMRI are a reduced acquisition time, possibility of performing automatic tissue segmentation and volume estimation and acquisition of quantitative parameters. SyMRI has been studied once in the spine, and significant differences in quantitative intervertebral disc values were found in relation to hydration-status of the disc. Since no single measurement has been proven to be the golden standard in previous studies, it is likely that a combination of measurements is needed for clinical application. Therefore, the aim of this pilot study is to explore a multi-parametric quantitative MRI approach including z-DTI, ASL, DSC, DCE, TMRE, and SyMRI to measure cervical intervertebral discs, the spinal cord and its nerve roots. OBJECTIVE: This study will consist of three parts. The primary objective of part 1 is to evaluate feasibility of the quantitative MRI sequences (e.g. z-DTI, ASL, DSC, DCE, TMRE, and SyMRI) for assessment of cervical spinal structures (e.g. intervertebral discs, spinal cord, and nerve roots) in healthy participants and patients with symptomatic CDDD. The primary objective of part 2 is to determine a correlation between the quantitative MRI sequences of cervical spinal structures to clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic CDDD. Finally, the primary aim of part 3 is to establish a correlation between quantitative MRI sequences of cervical spinal structures and surgical treatment within 6 months of follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective pilot study. STUDY POPULATION: The study population consists of healthy participants and patients with symptomatic CDDD with radiculopathy, myelopathy, or radiculomyelopathy. Age-matched healthy participants will be included. Participants have no previous history of cervical disc herniation or cervical surgery, a sufficient understanding of the Dutch language and no contraindications for an MRI scan. INTERVENTION: All participants will be subjected to several MRI sequences, using a state of the art 3T Siemens MRI Scanner available in the UMCG. First, all participants (healthy participants and patients with symptomatic CDDD) undergo baseline neurologic examination. Additionally, participants fill out the following questionnaires: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for arm and neck pain, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA), Nurick grade, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Work Ability Single Item (WAI-SI), and Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI). All participants undergo MRI scanning: localizer \& T2-weighted anatomical (conventional MRI), z-DTI, ASL, DSC, DCE, TMRE, and SyMR. The total scanning time will be approximately 40 minutes. For assessment of reproducibility, 10 healthy participants and 10 patients will be scanned 2 times on different days/times. The patients with symptomatic CDDD will have another study visit after 6 months of follow-up to assess their treatment status (having had surgery yes/no; in case of yes also the surgery characteristics), to fill out the abovementioned questionnaires and have an MRI with additional sequences. MAIN STUDY PARAMETERS/ENDPOINTS: Primary endpoints are the technical feasibility and repeatability for the quantitative MRI sequences (i.e. z\_DTI, ASL, DSC, DCE, TMRE, and SyMRI) of cervical spinal structures (i.e. intervertebral discs, spinal cord, and nerve roots) in healthy participants and patients with symptomatic CDDD. Also, a correlation of quantitative MRI sequences of cervical spinal structures to clinical impairment in patients with symptomatic CDDD will be determined. Clinical impairment will be measured with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for cervical radiculopathy, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (mJOA) for cervical myelopathy, and NDI as well as mJOA for radiculomyelopathy. NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE BURDER AND RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PARTICIPATION, BENEFIT AND GROUP RELATEDNESS: All participants (healthy and patients) will need a conventional MRI scan with quantitative MRI sequences, which will take approximately 40 minutes. Most MRI sequences used in this study are noninvasive and do not involve any ionizing radiation. However, DSC and DCE require administration of a bolus contrast. The contrast agent that will be used is Dotarem. Without any contra-indications for an MRI scan or contrast agent, health is not at risk. There is an overall negligible risk for participants, as based on the Risk Classification Checklist of the NFU. Therefore, the investigators can conclude that this study is a low-risk study.