This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of YL201 with Topotecan Hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether treatment with YL201 prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with treatment of topotecan hydrochloride among subjects with relapsed SCLC. The secondary objectives of the study are to further evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of YL201, and the correlation between B7-H3 expression level and the efficacy of YL201.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
438
Patients will be treated with YL201 intravenous (IV) infusion once every 3 weeks (Q3W) as a cycle at RP3D dose level.
Topotecan hydrochloride will be administered intravenously per prescribing information.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
To compare the OS of YL201 versus topotecan hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed SCLC.
(OS) defined as the time interval from the first randomization to death due to any cause.
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To compare Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) of YL201 versus topotecan hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed SCLC.
PFS defined as the time interval from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To compare Investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) of YL201 versus topotecan hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed SCLC.
ORR defined as the proportion of subjects who achieve a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To compare duration of response (DoR) as assessed by the investigator of YL201 versus topotecan hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed SCLC.
DoR defined as the time interval from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To compare time to response (TTR) as assessed by the investigator of YL201 versus topotecan hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed SCLC.
TTR defined as the time interval from randomization to the first documentation of response (CR or PR).
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To compare disease control rate (DCR) assessed by the investigator of YL201 versus topotecan hydrochloride in subjects with relapsed SCLC.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
DCR defined as the proportion of subjects with a BOR of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD).
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) of YL201.
AEs are assessed based on NCI CTCAE v5.0.
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To evaluate the concentration-time data for YL201, total antibody, and payload
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To characterize the PK parameter AUC
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
Characterize the PK parameter Cmax
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To characterize the PK parameter Ctrough
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
To characterize the PK parameter CL
Time frame: approximately within 36 months
Characterize the PK parameter Vd
Time frame: approximately within 36 months
Characterize the PK parameter t1/2
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
Assessment of B7H3 expression level in tumor tissue and the correlation between the expression level and the efficacy of YL201.
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months
Assessment of the number of subjects who are Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)-positive at any time and who have a treatment-emergent ADA
Time frame: Approximately within 36 months