Investigators hypothesize that the use of a human coach-supported digital/AI personal health assistant (app) will improve adherence to cholesterol-lowering medications (statins with or without ezetimibe) among patients with hyperlipidaemia and suboptimal LDL-C control, when compared to standard care.
Hyperlipidemia remains as one of the three leading metabolic risk factors underlying AMI onset by 2050. In recent study 3 Asian ethnicities with AMI, the incidence of hyperlipidemia is projected to increase by 205% (341 to 1041 per 100,000 population) from 2025 to 2050. A combination of lifestyle modifications and lipid-lowering therapy is typically recommended for individuals with high LDL-C levels to reduce the risk of CVD. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines adherence as "the extent to which the person's behaviour (including medication-taking) corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider" Poor medication adherence portends poorer health outcomes. In Singapore, around 60% of adults not taking their medications as prescribed (as above) and this creates a considerable economic and clinical burden to individuals and health systems. The use of digital technology in medication adherence has continued to grow as more healthcare providers and patients recognise its benefits in improving adherence and overall health outcome. Digital interventions have effectively helped patients manage their medication by reminding patients to take their medications on time and providing them with more information about their medications and treatment plan. In the busy world today, the provision of appropriately timed and that perceived to be important would be key to effectively convince intentionally non-adherent patients to take their medicines as prescribed. This study is a multicentre, open-label, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. We intent to randomly assign patients with hyperlipidaemia into one of the two groups: human coach-supported Digital/AI Personal Health Assistant app (intervention group) and standard care (control group) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The intervention group will receive personalised feedback through the app coupled with human coaching on top of usual clinical care for cholesterol management. The control group will receive usual standard of care for lipid management but will not receive the personalised app nor have access to health coaching. Participants with hyperlipidaemia (n=376) will be enrolled in polyclinics, and key inclusion criteria are participants who are non-adherent to statins "Extent to Non-adherence" sub-scale of the DOSE Non-Adherence Measure), with a score \> 1 (range from 0-15) with or without on ezetimibe and have LDL-C level above the recommended target levels stratified by risk category. Participants will be followed up at Visit 2 @Month 3, Visit 3 @ Month 6 and Visit 4 @ Month 12 while pill counts will be collected @3m, 6m, and 12m visits. As part of Standard-of-Care, clinical pharmacist will follow-up with patients, titrating lipid-lowering medication (such as statin, ezetimibe etc) as required, and review and take action clinical blood test results. Only those in intervention group, Human-AI-Health coach will use the information gathered by the AI chatbot to guide the targeted behavioural intervention during phone consultation. The scope of coaching will be strictly related to the medication adherence and general well-being. The coach will not start, stop, or titrate any medication. Coach will escalate concerns to clinical pharmacists when deemed fit. A sub-study of focus group discussion will be conducted with a nested sample of 30-50 intervention group patients. The aims are: (a) to collect insights from intervention patients on their experiences with the app and human health coaching, (b) insights into which intervention components work best for them and under what circumstances, (c) insights into concerns which might impact intervention effectiveness, (d) factors that draw their participation and sustained engagement, (e) factors that deter them from sustainable engagement, (f) factors that may lead other CVD patients to be more inclined to partake in such a intervention and (g) ideas and suggestions to make the intervention more appealing and effective.
Receive personalised feedback and educational content curated by local clinicians and pharmacists through the CADENCE D-PHA app coupled with six sessions of human coaching on top of usual clinical care for lipid management over 6 months
National Healthcare Group Polyclinics
Singapore, Singapore
RECRUITINGNational University Polyclinics
Singapore, Singapore
RECRUITINGEvaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication through the use of pill counts
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication through the use of Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 (MARS-5). The score ranges between 5 and 25, with higher scores indicating higher reported adherence.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Blood LDL-cholesterol levels
Blood LDL-cholesterol levels compared with those receiving standard care.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Cardiovascular Risk score
Different in Singapore-modified Framingham Risk Scores between intervention and control groups. The risk scores range between -5 and 20 for men and between 0 and 27 for women. Higher scores indicate higher 10-year coronary artery disease risk.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in health motivation and attitudes
Changes in health motivation and attitudes using Motivation and Attitude toward Changing Health (MATCH) Scale. It consists of 9 items rated on five-point Likert scale. Higher average scores indicate greater motivation and attitude.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in self-care efficacy
Changes in self-care efficacy using Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) in low-literacy patients with chronic disease. The scores range between 13 to 39, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for medication adherence
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
450
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in self-care behaviours
Changes in self-care behaviours using EQ-5D-5L, where index scores range from -0.59 to 1, with 1 being the best possible health state. The accompanying EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible health state.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in quality of life
Change in quality of life using Single-Item Quality of Life Scale (SI-QOL). A seven-point scale is used, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in quality of life
Change in quality of life using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Wellbeing Scale (FACIT-Sp). It consists of 12 items rated on a five-point Likert scale, with the total score ranging between 0 and 48. Higher total score indicates better spiritual wellbeing.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Safety of a new model of care
The health coaching integrated in the app is designed with a \"do no harm\" principle, ensuring that coaching interventions do not cause physical, psychological, or emotional harm to the participants. This principle is embedded both in the content delivered by the coaches and in the app. Adverse Event (AE) Monitoring: AE are uncommon for health coaching intervention. However, in the case that adverse psychological events do occur, (e.g., increased anxiety or nervousness), immediate emotional support will be provided. Health coaches will ensure that participants are in emotionally stable state through check-ins (built-in in the coaching checklist), and if necessary, refer them to the healthcare team. AE will be documented in the case notes. Participants will be encouraged to report any negative experiences /symptoms, related to the intervention by using the app or via direct communication with the coach. User feedback on the app-experiences will be collected.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Acceptability of a new model of care
Evaluate the acceptability of a new model of care with the use of Chatbot Usability Questionnaire. A higher score would imply better acceptability.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Acceptability of a new model of care
Evaluate the acceptability of a new model of care with the use of MHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). A higher score would imply better acceptability.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months