To evaluate the clinical outcomes of 2-year lymph node metastasis rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, and health-related quality of life in the patients with cT1N0M0 oral squamous cell carcinoma, who receive primary lesion resection combined with elective neck dissection or primary lesion resection only.
For the patients with cT1N0M0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), surgical resection of primary lesion is the preferred treatment. However, there are still debates on the neck management, some surgeons suggest elective neck dissection (END), and some surgeons suggest neck observation (NOB). The advantage of elective neck dissection is to clear the potential occult neck lymph node metastasis (about 15%), which could not be detected by clinical examination and imaging examination, and the disadvantage of END is to cause neck deformity, large scars, stiff neck and shoulders, difficulty in raising shoulders, and increase medical costs. The disadvantage of NOB is the risk of lymph node metastasis and disease progression. However, recent retrospective studies show that END has no potential benefit in improving survival in cT1N0M0 patients. The aim of the present trial is to compare the clinical outcomes between the cT1N0M0 OSCC patients, who receive primary lesion resection combined with elective neck dissection or primary lesion resection only, on the aspects of 2-year lymph node metastasis rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, and health-related quality of life. A total number of 300 patients will be recruited, including 150 patients in the experimental arm and 150 patients in the control arm. Experimental arm: radical resection of the primary lesion only, with neck observation, the safety margins of the primary lesion are 1.0-1.5cm far away from the palpable margins of the lesion. Control arm: radical resection of the primary lesion with 1.0-1.5cm safety margins, and elective neck dissection. A complete medical history will be obtained and tumor assessment will be performed at baseline. Patients will be followed-up by every three months in the first 2 years, every six months in the next 3-5 years, and once a year thereafter until death or data censoring. Two-year lymph node metastasis rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, and health-related quality of life will be collected and analyzed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
300
In the experimental arm: the neck management is neck observation, simultaneous elective neck dissection is not performed during the surgical resection of primary lesion. The patients will be followed up every two months for at least two years, focusing on the lymph node metastasis and local recurrence. Ultrasonography, CT scan, and/or MRI will be used to detect lesions. In the control arm: the neck management is elective neck dissection. Simultaneous elective neck dissection is performed during the surgical resection of primary lesion. The patients will be followed up every two months for at least two years, focusing on the lymph node metastasis and local recurrence. Ultrasonography, CT scan, and/or MRI will be used to detect lesions.
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, China
RECRUITINGRate of 2-year lymph node metastasis
Lymph node metastasis is confirmed by pathological examinations, using fine needle aspiration cytology or biopsy. The rate of 2-year lymph node metastasis rate is reported as the percentage of patients who are free from lymph node metastasis for 2 years from the date of randomization.
Time frame: 2 years
Rate of 2-year disease free survival
Disease free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis or death. The rate of 2-year disease free survival is reported as the percentage of patients who are disease free survival for 2 years from the date of randomization.
Time frame: 2 years
Rate of 2-year overall survival
Overall survival is calculated from the date of randomization to death. The rate of 2-year overall survival is reported as the percentage of patients who are overall survival for 2 years from the date of randomization.
Time frame: 2 years
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life will be measured and scored using the Chinese version of the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) scale. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 points. The lower the score, the worse the functional perception.
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.