Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

N/AUnknownNCT06624306

Fayoum University Hospital85 enrolled

Overview

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Urolithiasis Kidney Stone Complication

Interventions

Prone PNLPROCEDURE

Prone PNL

Prone-flexed PNLPROCEDURE

Prone-flexed PNL

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Staghorn calculi 2. Renal pelvis stones \>2 cm 3. Lower pole stones \>1.5 cm 4. SWL-resistant stones Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \<18 years or Pregnancy 2. Bilateral simultaneous PCNL 3. Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative 4. Morbid obesity (BMI \>40) 5. Non opaque renal stones. 6. Refuse to complete study requirements 7. Atypical bowel interposition need CT guided puncture 8. Tumour in the presumptive access tract area or Potential malignant kidney tumour

Locations (1)

Fayoum faculty of Medicine

Al Fayyum, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications

Outcome measures by using the clavien dindo classification system

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary Outcomes

Assessment of stone free rate of the two groups

Outcome measures by stone fragment residual ≤ 2 mm by computed tomography (CT)

Time frame: 1 year

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.