Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus Propofol During Hip Fractures Surgery

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT06631118

Ain Shams University60 enrolled

Overview

The study will compare the efficacy of Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) versus low dose Propofol for the achievement of painless sitting position before spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing repair of Hip fractures.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Difference in Reduction in Visual Analogue Score at 30 Minutes

Interventions

pericapsular nerve group block for group A,low dose intravenous Propofol [0.7mg/kg] over 30 seconds for group BPROCEDURE

Patients in group A will receive ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) while patients in group B will receive low dose intravenous Propofol0.7mg/kg\] over 30 seconds followed by spinal anesthesia in both groups

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 40 YearsMax age: 70 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * All patients in the age group ranging 40-70, both genders, belonging to physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with old fractures (more than 7 days), polytrauma, bleeding disorders or coagulopathy, local site infection, difficulty expressing pain scores such as hearing disability, mentally challenged, dementia or psychiatric illness and who refused to take part

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The difference in VAS scale

The primary outcome will be difference in median reduction in VAS-D .

Time frame: 30 min after giving propofol and the PENG block.

Central Contacts

Marwa Mamdouh Mohamed

CONTACT

01000205686 marwaemam600@gmail.com

Mohamed Mourad Ali

CONTACT

01006512101 mohamed_mourad@med.asu.edu.eg

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.