Skin cancers such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma lesions that develop on the head and neck are treated by Mohs surgery or wide local excision to remove all tumor cells and preserve the normal tissue. These surgical techniques may result in large wounds requiring reconstructive surgery to restore function and aesthetics. Older, frail patients are particularly vulnerable to complications from these invasive procedures often leaving them to care for chronic wounds until a split-thickness skin graft can be placed. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) is a manufactured protein that signals through the PDGF receptor, PDGFRβ, to mediate inflammation, granulation, angiogenesis, and remodeling during wound healing and skin repair and is FDA-cleared for diabetic neuropathic ulcers and periodontal bone and soft tissue reconstructions. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that rhPDGF may be a viable therapeutic strategy to augment the reconstruction of these complex surgical wounds by accelerating healing and reducing the time-to-readiness for skin graft placement.
This Phase II clinical trial will evaluate the potential efficacy of rhPDGF-BB-enhanced wound matrix versus wound matrix saturated with normal saline to augment the reconstruction of head and neck defects that cannot approximate and heal by primary intention following skin cancer excision. This prospective, double-blinded, single-site study will randomize participants into two arms - intervention and control - comparing the granulation rates of the wound bed, skin graft success, aesthetic outcomes, and quality of life. After recruiting, consenting, and screening, participants will be scheduled for the baseline procedure to place the wound matrix into the wound bed. Randomization will occur the day of the procedure, and both the investigator and participant will be blinded. To achieve balance in treatment allocation, randomization blocks of 4 (2 interventions : 2 controls) will be stratified by anatomical location, scalp versus face/neck, and greatest dimension, \< or = 3cm versus \> 3cm, of the surgical defect. Following the baseline procedure, participants will return for their first follow-up visit on day six for a clinical examination, suture removal, and wound dressing change, and follow-up visits will occur weekly for 8 weeks thereafter. At each visit, participants will complete the VAS pain scale and discuss any adverse events, the wound will be photographed and examined, and the investigator will assess the percent granulation and readiness for a skin graft. Participants will also submit daily photos of the wound while performing dressing changes at home starting on day seven until the skin graft procedure is completed. These photographs will be taken using a wound imaging application capable of ensuring a quality image, measuring the area of the wound, and transfer of the images to password-protected, cloud-based storage. The images will be analyzed by blinded wound experts, retrospectively, to determine the precise day (rather than the week) that the wound bed achieved 95-100% granulation. Placement of the skin graft may occur anytime between the first follow-up visit 1 week after the baseline procedure through 8 weeks. After the skin graft is placed, participants will continue the weekly visits through 8 weeks following the baseline procedure to assess pain and graft take. Under routine care with a wound matrix (no rhPDGF-BB), the average time to readiness is 4-6 weeks in this patient population. Here, we aim to reduce the time to readiness by adding rhPDGF-BB.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
RECRUITINGTime-to-Readiness for Skin Graft in Days
Time-to-readiness of the wound for a skin graft as determined by clinical review of wound bed granulation in photographic images taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure.
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Granulation Rate
Percent granulation versus time in days as determined by clinical assessment of the percent granulation of the wound bed in photographic images taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure.
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Change in Granulation on a 5-Point Scale
Weekly ordinal scale outcomes of granulation as determined by clinical assessment of the percent granulation of the wound bed in photographic images taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure. Ordinal scale ranges from 1 to 5 in the increments below. * 0-25% granulation = 1 * 26-50% granulation = 2 * 51-75% granulation = 3 * 76-95% granulation = 4 * Ready for a skin graft = 5
Time frame: Weekly, starting at week 1 up to week 8 following the baseline procedure
Time-to-Readiness for Skin Graft in Weeks
Time-to-readiness of wound for a skin graft as assessed by clinical examination at routine care, post-surgery, weekly visits.
Time frame: Weekly, starting at week 1 up to week 8 following the baseline procedure
Time to Skin Graft in Days
Time in days to skin graft procedure completed following the baseline procedure
Time frame: From day 7 up to day 566 following the baseline procedure
Percentage of Skin Graft Take
Skin graft take (percent graft take) as assessed by clinical examination at routine care, post-surgery visit at week 1 after the grafting procedure.
Time frame: Week 1 following skin graft placement
Aesthetics Rating at Week 8
Aesthetics rating of the wound as assessed by clinical examination at the final week 8 follow-up visit using an ordinal scale from 0 (very ugly) to 10 (very nice).
Time frame: Week 8
Scar Scale at Week 8
Scar rating of the wound as assessed by clinical examination at the final week 8 follow-up visit, with rating determined by the rankings of seven wound qualities on an ordinal scale from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar imaginable).
Time frame: Week 8
Change from Baseline in Pain on an 11-Point Scale
Weekly self-reported participant surveys will assess average pain intensity on an 11-point scale. Possible scores range from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain).
Time frame: From enrollment through week 8
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life
Change in quality of life based on a self-reported 12-question survey taken at baseline and at week 8.
Time frame: From enrollment through week 8
Number of Participants Recruited and Eligible
Total number of participants that were recruited and eligible for the study.
Time frame: Monthly up to month 15
Number of Participants Randomized Per Month
Number of participants that were randomized each month of the study.
Time frame: Monthly up to month 15
Proportion of Participants Retained at Week 8
Proportion of participants retained in the study at week 8 (end of study).
Time frame: Week 8
Weekly Percentage of Completed Daily Photos at Week 8
Participant adherence to daily wound photograph schedule.
Time frame: Weekly, week 1 up to week 8
Concordance of Time-to-Readiness Between Photograph Assessments versus Clinical Exams
Weekly concordance of time-to-readiness assessed by photographs vs. time-to-readiness assessed by clinical exam.
Time frame: Weekly, week 1 up to week 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.