Skin cancers such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma lesions that develop on the head and neck are treated by Mohs surgery or wide local excision to remove all tumor cells and preserve the normal tissue. These surgical techniques may result in large defects requiring reconstruction to restore function and aesthetics. Rotational flaps and free flaps are techniques used to reconstruct large, complex defects that cannot be closed with sutures, staples, or glue. Older, frail patients are particularly vulnerable to complications from these procedures often leaving them to care for chronic wounds until a skin graft can be placed. Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) revealed a cohort of patients with a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in PDGFRβ having a higher incidence of chronic skin ulcers, skin grafts, and other skin and connective tissue disorders suggesting that the loss of PDGFβ signaling may impair healing following trauma. rhPDGF-BB, a recombinant human platelet derived growth factor protein-based therapy, signals through PDGFRβ to mediate inflammation, granulation, angiogenesis, and remodeling during wound healing and skin repair and is FDA cleared for diabetic neuropathic ulcers and periodontal bone and soft tissue reconstructions. These data suggest rhPDGF-BB may be a viable therapeutic strategy to augment the reconstruction of these complex defects by accelerating granulation, epithelialization, and wound closure.
This Phase II clinical trial will evaluate the potential efficacy of rhPDGF-BB-enhanced wound matrix versus wound matrix saturated with normal saline to augment healing of head and neck defects that cannot be healed by primary intention following skin cancer excision. This prospective, double-blinded, single-site study will randomize participants into two arms - intervention and control - comparing the granulation, re-epithelialization, complete healing, and scarring of the wound bed, pain, and quality of life. After recruiting, consenting, and screening, participants will undergo the baseline procedure to place the wound matrix into the wound bed. Randomization will occur immediately before the baseline procedure, and both the PI and participant will be blinded. To achieve balance in treatment allocation, randomization blocks of 4 (2 interventions : 2 controls) will be stratified by anatomical location, scalp versus face/neck, and greatest dimension, \< 3cm versus \> 3cm, of the surgical defect. Following the baseline procedure, participants will return for their first follow-up visit on day 6 for a clinical examination, suture removal, and wound dressing change, and then again at weeks 4 and 8 for a clinical exam and photographs. Pain and adverse events will be evaluated and documented weekly through the participants' electronic health records, phone call, email survey, or in-person. Participants will submit daily photographs of the wound while performing dressing changes at home starting on day 7 until day 56. These photographs will be taken using a wound imaging application that will be downloaded to a personal mobile device with assistance from the study coordinator. Each patient will also receive a hard copy of instructions for using the application at home. The mobile application can ensure quality photographs and transfer the images to a password-protected cloud-based portal. The photographs will be analyzed by blinded wound experts, retrospectively, to determine the precise day that the wound bed achieved 81-100% granulation. The imaging software will also be used to trace and measure the rate of healing by granulation, re-epithelialization, and wound closure. Under routine care with a wound matrix (no rhPDGF-BB), the average time to granulation is 4-6 weeks in this patient population. Here, we aim to reduce the time to readiness by adding rhPDGF-BB. It is expected that all participants will complete the study which begins at time of signing informed consent and ends at the final study follow-up visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
RECRUITINGTime-to-Readiness for Skin Graft in Days
Time to 81-100% granulation of wounds as assessed by expert clinical review of photographs taken daily starting at day 7
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Granulation Rate
Percent granulation versus time in days as determined by clinical assessment of the percent granulation of the wound bed in photographic images taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure.
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Change in Granulation on a 5-Point Scale
Weekly ordinal scale outcomes of granulation as determined by clinical review of wound bed granulation in photographs taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure. Ordinal scale ranges from 1 to 5 in the increments below. * 0-20% granulation = 1 * 21-40% granulation = 2 * 41-60% granulation = 3 * 61-80% granulation = 4 * 81-100% = 5
Time frame: Weekly, starting at week 1 up to week 8 following the baseline procedure
Time to re-epithelialization
Time to 100% re-epithelialization as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure the percent of new epithelial tissue formed on the wound in daily photographs
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Re-epithelialization rate
Percent re-epithelialization versus time as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure the percent of new epithelial tissue formed on the wound in daily photographs
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Time to complete healing
Time to complete healing as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure wound closure in daily photographs
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Healing rate
Wound size change over time to as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure wound closure in daily photographs
Time frame: Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure
Aesthetics Rating at Week 8
Aesthetics rating of the wound as assessed by clinical examination at the final week 8 follow-up visit using an ordinal scale from 0 (very ugly) to 10 (very nice).
Time frame: Week 8
Scar Scale at Week 8
Scar rating of the wound as assessed by clinical examination at the final week 8 follow-up visit, with rating determined by the Manchester Scar Scale.
Time frame: Week 8
Change from Baseline in Pain on an 11-Point Scale
Weekly self-reported participant surveys will assess average pain intensity on an 11-point scale. Possible scores range from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain).
Time frame: From enrollment through week 8
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life
Change in quality of life based on a self-reported 12-question survey taken at baseline and at week 8.
Time frame: From enrollment through week 8
Number of Participants Recruited and Eligible
Total number of participants that were recruited and eligible for the study.
Time frame: Monthly up to month 15
Number of Participants Randomized Per Month
Number of participants that were randomized each month of the study.
Time frame: Monthly up to month 15
Proportion of Participants Retained at Week 8
Proportion of participants retained in the study at week 8 (end of study).
Time frame: Week 8
Weekly Percentage of Completed Daily Photos at Week 8
Participant adherence to daily wound photograph schedule.
Time frame: Weekly, week 1 up to week 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.