Clinical Evaluation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Wet Bonding Technique

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT06635382

Manipal University College Malaysia68 enrolled

Overview

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) wet bonding has shown promising results in several in vitro studies. However, there are a lack of clinical trials which prove the advantages of this technique. The aim of the study is to clinically assess the effect of DMSO wet bonding on composite restoration in non carious cervical lesions.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Dimethyl Sulfoxide

Interventions

Universal single bond adhesiveOTHER

Will be applied and light cured for 20 seconds.

DMSOOTHER

DMSO application on tooth followed by active application of universal single bond adhesive and light cured for 20 seconds.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Two similar non carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the facial/labial surfaces of premolars. * NCCLs of score 1-3 on the Smith and Knight tooth wear index. * Favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact. Exclusion Criteria: * NCCLs on the lingual surface. * Medically compromised individuals. * Periodontally compromised teeth. * Bruxism and visible wear facets in the posterior dentition. * Fractured or visibly cracked premolars and canines. * Known allergies to resin-based restorative materials. * Presently undergoing orthodontic treatment. * Abutment teeth for fixed or removable prostheses.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Fracture of material

Different fracture patterns and retention failures may occur in relation to the type of restoration: cracks, chipping/ delamination, bulk fractures, or incomplete and complete loss of retention. Assessed by Visual examination and short air drying. Criteria set from Clinically excellent/very good(sufficient) (Score 1) to Clinically poor (entirely insufficient)(Score 5)

Time frame: From treatment to 3-6 months follow up

Marginal adaptation

There are different interfaces between the dental hard tissue, restorative material, and adhesive and/or luting resin/cement layer. Each interface can degrade and potentially alter marginal adaptation. In clinical practice, it is impossible to distinguish failures between the different interfaces. Therefore, only the marginal adaptation as such can be assessed by visual examination and short air drying. Scores given depending upon the quality of restoration from Clinically excellent/very good (sufficient) (Score 1) to Clinically poor (entirely insufficient) (Score 5)

Time frame: From treatment to 3-6 months follow up

Central Contacts

Anchu Rachel Thomas

CONTACT

1-700-811-662 rachel.thomas@manipal.edu.my

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.