Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death. The gold-standard test used to diagnose CAD is invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, nearly half the patients who receive ICA are found to have no disease or non-significant disease. This means that while they receive a diagnosis, they do not receive any therapeutic benefit. This is concerning because ICA is expensive and it carries a risk to patients. A non-invasive diagnostic test, cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), has been shown to be as effective as ICA at diagnosing CAD in the right patient population, while being less expensive and less risky for patients. An optimal solution would involve screening to identify which patients are good candidates for CCTA vs. which should receive ICA. This screening tool could be used in a triage pathway to ensure that every patient gets the test that is best for them. The investigators have used Artificial Intelligence (AI) to develop a model for determining which patients should receive ICA vs. which should receive CCTA. The investigators have also developed a triage pathway to direct patients to the most appropriate test. The investigators now plan to evaluate the AI tool combined with the triage pathway through a clinical trial at Hamilton Health Sciences and Niagara Health. This model of care will reduce risk to patients, reduce wait times for ICA and reduce costs to the health care system.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
251
In the usual care group, patients will proceed directly to ICA following referral from community cardiology, as is the current standard of care. Research staff will screen participants in this group for significant CAD using the decision support tool; however, the tool's recommendations will not affect their care, as all patients in this group will invariably receive ICA.
Patients randomized to the intervention will have selected features of their medical history, recorded on their referral form, entered into a decision support tool by research personnel to generate a recommendation of whether they should proceed directly to ICA or whether they should receive CCTA. Patients with recommendations for ICA will proceed directly to ICA. Patients with recommendations for CCTA will be referred to CCTA. Based on the results of the CCTA, recommendations for medical management versus referral for ICA will be made.
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
McMaster University Medical Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
St. Catharines Hospital
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Rate of normal/non-obstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA
The rate of normal or non-obstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA in patients referred for cardiac investigation. The rate for an arm (control vs experimental) is calculated by dividing the number of patients diagnosed with normal/non-obstructive CAD through ICA by the total patients allocated to the arm.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Quantitative assessment of number of angiograms avoided
Number of angiograms avoided due to CCTA bookings.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Deviation from management recommendations following CCTA (i.e. angiograms performed when not recommended)
Number of angiograms performed when not recommended.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Diagnostic yield of invasive angiography
Diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of invasive angiograms that identify significant disease (≥70% stenosis) on a major coronary vessel (\>2 mm) or \>50% stenosis in the left main).
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Sex differences in rate of normal/non-obstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA
Difference in the rate of normal/non-obstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA between males and females.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Site differences in rate of normal/non-obstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA
Difference in the rate of normal/non-obstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA between sites.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Budget impact of new strategy for risk stratification of CAD in low-risk patients
Cost of risk stratification of CAD in low risk patients.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
Number of low-quality CCTAs
The quality will be graded on a per-patient basis using a three-class system: low quality, denoting an image in which the coronary anatomy cannot be clearly defined, requiring ICA within 90 days for clarification; suboptimal quality, denoting an image in which the coronary anatomy was equivocal for one or more non-prognostic vessels but not requiring ICA based on CCTA findings and clinical presentation; and high quality, denoting an image in which the coronary anatomy could be clearly defined.
Time frame: 90 days (after randomization)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.