The MethMax trial is a prospective, international, multicentre, randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, low intervention study. Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis treated with oral methotrexate up to 25mg weekly will be randomised in 50:50 fashion to receive 25mg oral vs subcutaneous methotrexate for the period of 24 weeks. In regular visits, patient reported outcomes, clinical disease activity, therapy adherence and diverse established and exploratory biomarkers will be assessed.
Methotrexate is recommended as the first-line therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, a significant proportion of patients does not achieve disease remission with methotrexate monotherapy, which can be attributed to multiple reasons. We hypothesize, that the efficacy limitations of this well-known medication can be, to some extent, overcome by sufficient dose and route optimisation. Furthermore, individual factors effecting the treatment response are unknown. Thus, we aim to evaluate the "maximised methotrexate therapy" before switching to biologic or targeted synthetic drugs. The MethMax trial is a prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, low-intervention trial, including 182 patients across 7 European countries. Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis, naïve to biologic or targeted synthetic antirheumatic drugs, who have been on a stable oral methotrexate therapy for the past 3 months will be randomised in 1:1 ratio to either 25mg oral or 25mg subcutaneous methotrexate weekly. In both arms, a short glucocorticoid therapy will be prescribed at baseline visit. The active study duration for each patient is 24 weeks. After inclusion, study visits take place at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. The clinical efficacy and safety parameters will be obtained at each visit. At predefined timepoints, further patient reported outcomes, exploratory biomarkers like sweat and blood metabolites, as well as medication adherence will be assessed. Written consent will be obtained for all participants. The study has received regulatory approval via the Clinical Trials Information System and has recently started recruitment at the first centre. The anticipated results will suggest whether the subcutaneous administration of 25mg methotrexate weekly is superior to oral methotrexate 25mg and lower doses in each route respectively. The outcomes include clinical disease activity, methotrexate metabolism analyses and medication adherence. The gained knowledge could lead to individual therapy optimisation and new therapy recommendations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
182
comparison between oral and subcutaneous methotrexate dosis of 25mg
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
RECRUITINGCDAI remission (≤2.8) at week 24
The primary endpoint is the achievement of remission defined as the CDAI ≤2.8 assessed 24 weeks after randomisation comparing patients with dose/route optimization (≥10mg MTX oral weekly switched to 25mg MTX subcutaneously weekly) and oral dose optimization (≥10mg MTX oral weekly switched to 25mg MTX oral weekly).
Time frame: 24 weeks
CDAI low disease activity (≤10) at week 24
To assess the proportion of patients in CDAI low disease activity (≤10) at week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
CDAI remission (≤2.8) at week 12
To assess the proportion of patients in CDAI remission (≤2.8) at week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
CDAI low disease activity (≤10) at week 12
To assess the proportion of patients in CDAI low disease activity (≤10) at week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
ACR20% response at week 24
To assess the proportion of patients achieving an ACR20% response at week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
ACR20% response at week 12
To assess the proportion of patients achieving an ACR20% response at week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
ACR50% response at week 24
To assess the proportion of patients achieving an ACR50% response at week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
ACR50% response at week 12
To assess the proportion of patients achieving an ACR50% response at week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
ACR70% response at week 24
To assess the proportion of patients achieving an ACR70% response at week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
ACR70% response at week 12
To assess the proportion of patients achieving an ACR70% response at week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Patient reported outcomes on NRS
Difference in change (absolute and relative) of patient reported outcomes on numeric response scale (NRS), including pain, patient global assessment, and joint stiffness between the treatment groups between baseline and week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
Patient reported outcomes on NRS
Difference in change (absolute and relative) of patient reported outcomes on numeric response scale (NRS), including pain, patient global assessment, and joint stiffness between the treatment groups between baseline and week 24
Time frame: 12 weeks
Quality of Life questionnaires
Difference in change (absolute and relative) of patient reported outcomes measured by questionnaires: 1. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) 2. the 36-Item Short Form Survey version 1 (SF36v1) 3. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) between the treatment groups between baseline and week 12
Time frame: 24 weeks
Quality of Life questionnaires
Difference in change (absolute and relative) of patient reported outcomes measured by questionnaires: 1. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) 2. the 36-Item Short Form Survey version 1 (SF36v1) 3. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) between the treatment groups between baseline and week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Joint count and inflammatory markers
Difference in change (absolute and relative) of swollen joint count, tender joint count and CRP/ESR between baseline and week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
Joint count and inflammatory markers
Difference in change (absolute and relative) of swollen joint count, tender joint count and CRP/ESR between baseline and week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.