A multicenter, national, prospective, observational pharmacological study of patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) or cefiderocol (CEF) monotherapy or combination therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam associated with fosfomycin (FOS) or cefiderocol associated with fosfomycin.
Gram-negative infections, particularly those caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have a dramatic impact on patient survival. Despite the introduction of new drugs in the last years have improved the outcome of patients with difficult-to-treat gram-negative infections, mortality and relapse rates are still relevant, especially in patients with high-risk sources such as pneumonia, and those in which the attainment of optimal exposure could be reduced by underlying renal disease. The use of a combination regimen in these scenarios has been proposed. However, a standardized approach to therapeutic management is still missing. To overcome this unmet clinical need, this study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) optimization of antibiotic dosing regimens in patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections, using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). A prompt implementation of an appropriate targeted antibiotic therapy could represent a valuable approach to improve clinical outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections. Moreover, more information is needed in pediatric populations where ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is approved only for children aged \> 3 months (with the same indications as adults) and cefiderocol (CEF) is not approved. Indeed, cefiderocol is currently off-label administered in pediatric population using case-by-case dosages based on encouraging case reports. Since several in vitro studies have highlighted the synergistic effect of fosfomycin (FOS) with different antibiotic classes, including cephalosporins such drug could be an appealing option in combination therapy for the management of difficult-to-treat gram-negative infections, both with CAZ/AVI and CEF. However, real-life prospective studies are needed to investigate the potential benefit of combination therapy on clinical outcomes and the occurrence of further resistance. Thus, the correct dose of FOS along with the type of administration (i.e., intermittent, extended, or continuous infusion) are issues to establish. In particular, the primary aim of the study is to evaluate the probability of achieving pre-determined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) efficacy targets for CAZ/AVI, CEF and FOS. Secondary objectives are: * to evaluate the relationship between the achievement of the PK/PD target of CAZ/AVI, CEF and FOS and microbiological eradication; * to evaluate the trend of clinical biomarkers in response to antibiotic therapy; * to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of protein biomarkers. This research is supported by EU funding within the Next Generation EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
Irccs Aoubo
Bologna, Italy
RECRUITINGAzienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione (ARNAS) Garibaldi
Catania, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGASST-FBF-Sacco
Milan, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAzienda Ospedale - Università Padova
Padua, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGIstituto mediterraneo per i trapianti e terapie ad alta specializzazione (ISMETT)
Palermo, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPoliclinico Umberto I
Rome, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPoliclinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
Rome, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGOspedale Pediatrico Bambin Gesù
Rome, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Rome, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Senese
Siena, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 1 more locations
PK/PD efficacy targets for study drugs
Primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients achieving the PK/PD efficacy target. Since these drugs are widely used in clinical practice, safety is not evaluated in this study
Time frame: From enrollment (treatment onset) to the end of treatment (up to 7 days)
Difference in SOFA score
Difference in SOFA score (pSOFA for pediatric patients) between day 0 (day of index positive cultures) and day 7
Time frame: From day 0 (day of index positive culture) and day 7
Difference in C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Difference in C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) between day 0 and day 7
Time frame: From day 0 (day of index positive culture) and day 7
Identification of new protein-based biomarkers
* Difference in protein-based biomarkers at day 0 between study patients and a group of healthy subjects * Difference in protein-based biomarkers in study patients between different timepoints (from treatment onset to the end of treatment)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment (up to 7 days)
Microbiological eradication
Microbiological eradication defined as bacteremia clearance or negativization of index diagnostic samples within 7 days from index BC
Time frame: From day 0 (day of index positive culture) and day 7
Relapse and/or reinfection
Relapse (new infection with the same pathogen emerging after treatment) and/or reinfection (new infection with a different pathogen emerging after treatment) rates at day 90
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality at day 30 and at day 90
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.