The goal of our study is to compare ultrasound-guided caudal block to the conventional technique based on anatomical landmarks.
The primary endpoint was the success rate of each technique. We also collected the time taken for each technique, the number of punctures, and the incidence of complications (subcutaneous infiltration, intravascular injection). Children were randomized to receive a caudal block based on anatomical landmarks (group C) or ultrasound-guided (group E) at a dose of 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine, not exceeding 20 ml.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
94
caudal block using Ultrasound
Caudal Block based on anatomical landmarks
Bechir Hamza hospital
Tunis, Tunis Governorate, Tunisia
RECRUITINGSuccess rate of block
A successful block was defined as an absence of significant motor movements following surgical induction or aberrations in the heart or respiratory rates
Time frame: during surgery
block performing time
the period between anatomical structures identification and termination of LA administration
Time frame: perioperative
number of needle puncture
Time frame: during procedure
complication rates
Blood aspiration Subcutaneous bulging Bone contact Dural puncture Local anesthetic toxicity
Time frame: during procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.