HIV prevalence among transgender women (TW) in the United States is high (\~14%). The best way to reduce HIV incidence in this population is to link TW to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which can reduce HIV transmission by up to 86%, with optimal adherence. The FDA approved the first long-acting form of PrEP, injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA), in late 2021, which has the potential to decrease HIV transmission and increase PrEP adherence among TW. The addition of CAB-LA to available PrEP options necessitates TW and PrEP service providers select the best method (oral vs injectable) for each TW. However, TW have unique concerns about PrEP (e.g., interactions with gender-affirming hormones) and report that patient/provider discussions on this medication are suboptimal. Thus, to inform this shared decision process, the proposed study builds on formative work by developing and pilot-testing "WePrEP," a PrEP-focused bilingual digital shared decision-making tool (SDMT), tailored to diverse English- and Spanish-speaking TW and PrEP service providers. WePrEP will support communication between TW and PrEP service providers as they identify the ideal PrEP product for each TW and discuss associated adherence strategies by cuing conversations on TW's unique PrEP needs/concerns and presenting pertinent information that is culturally relevant and tailored to this population. To develop and test WePrEP, the investigators will partner with the Mile High Behavioral Healthcare Transgender Center of the Rockies, a Denver-based transgender-serving organization. They will use McNulty et al.'s adapted Shared Decision-Making Model for TW to guide the iterative participatory design process we will use with a group of racially/ethnically diverse TW and PrEP service providers, to develop WePrEP; we will begin this process using prototypes created from preliminary data (Aim 1a). The investigators will rigorously assess the usability of WePrEP via simulated patient/provider discussions (Aim 1b). Next, they will pilot test WePrEP in a randomized controlled trial (RCT; N=69 TW) with 2:1 randomization. In the RCT, PrEP service providers (N=4, of which n=1 is bilingual) will use WePrEP with intervention TW to select CAB-LA or oral PrEP and discuss adherence. Other providers (N=2, of which n=1 is bilingual) will give control TW a standard of care explanation of PrEP (CDC recommendations) to help them make their PrEP choice. TW will be referred to Sheridan Health Services to start PrEP. We will assess primary (feasibility; acceptability) and secondary (potential mechanisms of action of WePrEP; preliminary impact) outcome measures using validated scales and rigorous qualitative methods (Aims 2, 3). By creating a bilingual digital SDMT to enhance communication between TW and PrEP service providers as TW choose their ideal PrEP modality, this project is likely to make a widespread and lasting impact on TW's uptake and adherence to PrEP.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
WePrEP will be bilingual, both patient- and provider-facing, stored on the provider's electronic device (and will have the capability to integrate with electronic health records in the future to enable scalability), and easily accessible during in-person or virtual patient-provider encounters. WePrEP is designed to present pertinent PrEP information to transgender women and their PrEP service providers to stimulate discussions about PrEP choice and support adherence (once a PrEP strategy has been chosen). We hypothesize that this will ensure selection of the ideal PrEP method and improve subsequent adherence.
Standard of care recommendations to discuss PrEP with potential end-users, endorsed by the CDC.
Transgender Center of the Rockies
Sheridan, Colorado, United States
RECRUITINGFeasibility
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) \[Range: 1-5; Higher scores mean greater feasibility\]
Time frame: At enrollment
Acceptability
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) \[Range: 1-5; Higher scores mean greater acceptability\]
Time frame: At enrollment
Preliminary impact (1st of 3 measures)
Proportion of transgender women who receive their first dose of either form of PrEP (measured at enrollment).
Time frame: The proportion of transgender women who receive either form of PrEP is measured at enrollment.
Preliminary impact (2nd of 3 measures)
Proportion of transgender women who have a high enough serum concentration of either form of PrEP to prevent HIV at the second dose (measured at follow-up).
Time frame: For oral PrEP: PrEP serum concentrations are measured at 3 months. For injectable PrEP: PrEP serum concentrations are measured at 2 months.
Preliminary impact (3rd of 3 measures)
Proportion of transgender women who refill (oral PrEP) or take an injection (injectable PrEP) at the second dose (measured at follow-up).
Time frame: For oral PrEP: PrEP refills are measured at 3 months. For injectable PrEP: Injections are measured at 2 months.
Mechanisms of action: Patient/provider communication (1st of 7 measures)
Communication composite measure from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers \& Systems (CAHPS) \[Range: 1-4; Higher scores mean better communication\]
Time frame: Measured at enrollment
Mechanisms of action: Satisfaction with communication (2nd of 7 measures)
Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication and Treatment Decision-making Effectiveness (COMRADE) \[Range: 1-5 where higher scores mean greater satisfaction\]
Time frame: Measured at enrollment
Mechanisms of action: Patient/provider engagement (3rd of 7 measures)
Engagement with Health Care Providers (HCP) scale \[Range: 1-5, where higher scores mean greater engagement\]
Time frame: Measured at enrollment
Mechanisms of action: Evidence of shared decision-making (4th of 7 measures)
Control Preferences Scale (CPS) - domain measuring actual control over decision \[Range: 1-5, where higher scores mean greater control\]
Time frame: Measured at enrollment
Mechanisms of action: Satisfaction with control over PrEP decision (5th of 7 measures)
Control Preference Scale (CPS) - domain measuring control satisfaction \[Range: 1-5, where higher scores mean greater satisfaction\]
Time frame: Measured at enrollment
Mechanisms of action: Knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy to use PrEP (6th of 7 measures)
PrEP Knowledge, Motivation, \& Self-Efficacy Assessment \[Range: 1-5, where higher scores mean greater knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy\]
Time frame: Measured at enrollment
Mechanisms of action: Satisfaction with PrEP choice (7th of 7 measures)
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire \[Range: 1-5, where higher scores mean greater satisfaction\]
Time frame: Measured at follow-up (for oral PrEP users, this is at 3 months; for injectable PrEP users, this is at 2 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.