In people diagnosed with lymphoma receiving immunochemotherapy treatment, a combined exercise intervention, as opposed to the general recommendations, will achieve: 1.Improve cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, psychological well-being and quality of life. //2.Reduce fatigue//3.Reduce frailty There is an association between some biological biomarkers with physical capacity and frailty.
In this study, the effectiveness of an individualized adjuvant exercise program will be analyzed in a homogeneous population of people diagnosed with lymphoma in active treatment. Taking into account the limited scientific evidence that currently exists in people affected by lymphoma and active treatment, the study could be of great relevance when it comes to providing scientific evidence in this very little field studied. The study will try to respond to the evident need to focus the research area on supervised exercise in people with lymphoma in a way innovative, with the aim of generating new hypotheses that overcome existing limitations and facilitate the introduction of this type of interventions into the health system. The present study will also analyze the effect of exercise from a gender perspective, an aspect not systematically studied until now, providing a new vision on the baseline differences and after intervention of a program based on of sex. The study will include adults with lymphoma with special focus on the subanalysis of the group of patients equal or more than 70 years old. The lymphoma unit of the Donostia University Hospital (HUD) is part of the Onkofrail project that analyzes the impact of a physical activity in older cancer patients. The Onkofrail study has included everything type of solid tumors and very diverse treatments, which is a limitation methodology that could condition the analysis of the results. Therefore, the need of proposing a new exercise project in a homogeneous population such as that of people with lymphoma, the most prevalent hemopathy in our environment, which has a great survival, but present important adverse effects secondary to treatment systemic. 30 people with lymphoma and treatment have been included in the Onkofrail study asset. The preliminary results of said pilot study have been used for the design of this new study, making adaptations, both in the recruitment time, as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria, which guarantee and optimize the correct research development. Main objective: The main objective is to assess whether a supervised (2 days/week) combined (resistance+aerobic interval training) exercise intervention, plus 2 days/week unsupervised for 20 weeks improves cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in people diagnosed with lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy, compared to a control group receiving only general recommendations. Secondary objectives: 1. To estimate cardiorespiratory capacity (VO2peak) through a field test Modified Shuttle Walking Test (MSWT) and other covariates related to body composition, heart rate, among others. Validation of the predictive model. 2. To characterise and define the profile of the population diagnosed with lymphoma at the physical, emotional, and biochemical (biomarker) and immune system level prior to an intervention with exercise. 3. To investigate whether the implementation of an exercise programme adjuvant to immunochemotherapy treatment modifies fatigue, adherence (actual dose-intensity), and toxicity related to clinical treatment. 4. To analyse whether the intervention with exercise is effective in increasing strength levels, improving quality of life and sleep. 5. To clarify whether there are sex differences in the efficacy of the exercise programme adjuvant to immunochemotherapy treatment. 6. To analyse the benefit of adding exercise programmes in different subgroups of people with lymphoma, with a special focus on the group of patients aged ≥70 years, with the aim of maximising the cost-effectiveness of implementation in the care routine in all patients. 7. To analyse the degree of adherence to the programme: degree of attendance at planned sessions and percentage of participants who complete the post-intervention evaluation. 8. To report the degree of satisfaction by people affected by lymphoma, as reported in an interview.
The lymphoma unit of the Donostia University Hospital (HUD) is part of the Onkofrail project that analyzes the impact of a physical activity in older cancer patients. The Onkofrail study has included everything type of solid tumors and very diverse treatments, which is a limitation methodology that could condition the analysis of the results. Therefore, the need of proposing a new PE project in a homogeneous population such as that of people with lymphoma, the most prevalent hemopathy in our environment, which has a great survival, but present important adverse effects secondary to treatment systemic.
Hospital Universitario Araba (HUA)
Vitoria - Gateiz, Araba, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Universitario Galdakao (HUG)
Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGHospital Universitario Donostia (HUD)
San Sebastián, Guipuzcoa, Spain
RECRUITINGCardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
Measured by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) before starting chemotherapy treatment and after 20 weeks of intervention, using the cardiorespiratory exercise test.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sociodemographic, etiological and clinical health variables (A)
Recruitment Center (Donostia University Hospital, Galdakao University Hospital , Alava University Hospital)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sociodemographic, etiological and clinical health variables (B)
Birthdate.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sociodemographic, etiological and clinical health variables (C)
Biological sex (man, woman, I prefer not to answer)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sociodemographic, etiological and clinical health variables (D)
Gender (man, woman, non-binary or I prefer not to answer)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sociodemographic, etiological and clinical health variables (E)
Educational level (no studies, elementary, high school, vocational training, university, I prefer not to answer, others)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sociodemographic, etiological and clinical health variables (F)
Home composition (single person, lives with couple, lives with family, institutionalized, I prefer not to answer, others)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (A.1.)
Clinical Research Platform - Health Research Institut Biogipuzkoa
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
180
Muscle power and fragility --\> SIT - TO STAND (STS) POWER: time to repeat the action 5 (sec)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (A.2.)
Muscle power and fragility --\> FRAILTY TRAIT TEST SCALE (FTS-5): BMI (kg/m)2; running time (sec); grip strength (kg); Progressive Romberg Test (positive/negative).
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (B.1.)
G8 Scale (0-17 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (B.2.)
Fried Frailty Phenotype (0-5 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (C)
Physical Condition: Modified Shuttle Walking Field Test (meters)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (D)
UPPER BODY MUSCLE STRENGTH (HANGRIP) (Newton)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (E)
Body composition --\> Height (cm); Weight (kg); Waist circumference (cm); hip circumference (cm); body mass index (kg/m2); fat free mass (kg and %); fat mass (kg and %); total body water (kg and %); phase angle (º); systolic blood pressure (mmHG); diastolic blood presure (mmHg); resistance (Ω); reactance (Ω).
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (F)
Physical activity level --\> Global Questionnaire on Physical Activity (GPAQ)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (G)
Sleep Quality --\> Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS EPWORTH) (0-24 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Functionality and fragility variables at times T0, T1 and T2 (H)
Acelerometry (h/d)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Patient Reported Results (A)
Quality of Life Questionnaire --\> Hematological Malignancy - Patient Reported Outcome (HM-PRO) at times T0, T1 and T2 (Nothing, mild and serious)
Time frame: 20 weeks
3. Patient-reported results (PRO):
EORTC QLQ - FA13
Time frame: 20 weeks
Biomarkers
Inflammation (pg/ml or ng/ml), Hematological (pg/ml or ng/ml), Endocrine Nutritional (pg/ml or ng/ml), Immunosenescence (pg/ml or ng/ml),
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (A)
Gijon Scale (3-15 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (B)
Basic Activity of Dialy Living (BADL) - Barthel Scale (0-10 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (C)
Instrumental Activity of Dialy Livings (IADL) - Lawton Scale (0-8 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (D)
Cognitive Function - Pfeiffer Test (0-10 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (E)
Nutritional Status - Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-form (MNA.SFI) (0-14 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (F)
Polypharmacy (number of chronica drug consumed by the participant)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (G)
Geriatric Syndromes - Immobility and pressure ulcers (Yes/No); instability and falls (Yes/No); urinary and faecal incontinence (Yes/No); dementia and acute confusional syndrome ( Yes//No); malnutrition (Yes/No); alterations in sight and hearing (Yes/No);constipation, faecal impaction (Yes/No);depression/insomnia (Yes/No)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (H)
Pain - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-10 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Variables of Geriatric Assessment (VGA) comprehensive in patients (I)
Emotional Distress - Stress Thermometer (0-10 pts)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Treatment data and results after the intervention (T2) (A)
Treatment Suspension (Yes/No)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Treatment data and results after the intervention (T2) (B)
Dose Reduction (Yes/No)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Treatment data and results after the intervention (T2) (C)
Treatment percentage completed (%)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Treatment data and results after the intervention (T2) (D)
Treatment Completion (Yes/No)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Assessment of the intervention at T2 (A)
Adverse events associated with intervention (Number of adverse events)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Assessment of the intervention at T2 (B)
Satisfaction with the intervention (Yes/No)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Assessment of the intervention at T2 (C)
Adherence to the intervention (Yes/No)
Time frame: 20 weeks