This study will be used to compare the effects of two auditory stimulation methods on improving vital signs parameters, reducing the severity of chest pain, and improving the sleep quality of cardiac patients.
This study aims to To evaluate the relative efficacy of two auditory stimulation techniques in enhancing cardiac patients' vital sign assessments. * This study aims to examine two auditory stimulations for their ability to alleviate chest pain in patients with heart conditions. * The goal of this study is to evaluate two audio stimulations for their potential to help heart patients have a better night's rest. This research made use of two different therapies including audio stimulation. Group A used familiar auditory stimulus, which was a spoken message, and group B used sounds of nature. Patients with preexisting cardiac conditions who were admitted to a predetermined critical care unit and who subsequently intended to have percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Group A receives the family voice
Group B receives the nature sound.
Faculty of nursing Damanhour university
Damanhūr, Egypt
sleep quality
sleep quality used Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). it consisted of five items score from zero mean poor pattern and 100 mean good
Time frame: three days after intervention
severity of chest pain
Visual analogue scale consisted of score from 0 to 10 zero mean no pain and 10 mean high pain
Time frame: three days after intervention
level of anxiety and depression
The hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire consisted of 14 questions 7 for anxiety and 7 for depression score score 0-7 mean normal; score 8-10 mean mild; score 11-15, mean moderate; and score 16-21, mean severely
Time frame: three days after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.