The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficiency of two fertilization techniques used in Assisted Reproduction: conventional In Vitro fertilization (cIVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), in terms of in-vitro and clinical results, in non-male infertility patients, comparing them in sibling oocytes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ICSI result in better fertilization rate, blastocyst rate or usable blastocyst rate? Does ICSI result in better pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates? Researchers will compare cIVF to ICSI in sibling oocytes to assess if a technique offers better results. Participants undergoing an IVF/ICSI cycle will have their oocytes randomly divided in two groups: the oocytes from one group will be fertilized using cIVF and the oocytes from the other group using ICSI.
It is a prospective randomized study performed in the Reproduction Unit of Hospital Clinico San Carlos, in Madrid. The study involves In Vitro Fertilization cycles with at least 6 oocytes retrieved and with normal semen parameters according to WHO. The objective is to compare conventional In Vitro Fertilization (cIVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in sibling oocytes from the same cohort. The oocytes obtained after the ovum pick up will be randomly divided in two groups and the fertilization technique (cIVF or ICSI) will be randomly assigned to each group. Maturity stage, fertilization and embryo development to blastocyst will be individually recorded for every oocyte. Additionally, the destination of every embryo (transferred, cryopreserved or discarded) will be registered. This decision will be based just on embryo quality, irrespective of the fertilization technique. MII rate, blastocyst rate and usable blastocyst (transferred or cryopreserved) rate will be calculated for each group. Additionally, embryo transfers will be performed in the fresh cycle or in the associated thaw cycles using the cryopreserved embryos. In every transfer, the technique used to obtain the transferred embryo will be registered. The results of the embryo transfers will be recorded as pregnancy (positive beta-hCG 14 days after transfer), clinical pregnancy (diagnosed by ultrasonographic visualization of a gestational sac 4 weeks after transfer, including ectopic pregnancy) and live birth delivery (deliveries with at least one live birth). Pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth delivery rate will be calculated for each group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
128
Fertilization via conventional In Vitro Fertilization
Fertilization via intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Usable blastocyst rate
Percentage of oocytes that develop to blastocyst stage and are transferred of cryopreserved
Time frame: From oocyte retrieval to 6 days after
Fertilization rate
Percentage of oocytes that show normal fertilization
Time frame: From oocyte retrieval to 24 hours later
Blastocyst rate
Percentage of oocytes that develop to blastocyst stage
Time frame: From oocyte retrieval to 6 days after
Pregnancy rate
Percentage of embryo transfers that has a positive beta-hCG 14 days post-transfer
Time frame: From embryo transfer to 14 days later
Clinical pregnancy rate
Percentage of transfers that have a gestational sac observed 4 weeks post-transfer
Time frame: From embryo transfer to 4 weeks later
Live birth delivery rate
Percentage of transfers that end with the delivery of at least one live baby
Time frame: From embryo transfer to 40 weeks later
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.