To date, patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) and permanent ileostomies have been excluded from clinical trials for new treatments. To allow this patient population to be included in clinical trials, outcome and measurement tools are needed. This study aims to develop a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) and Endoscopic Index (EI) for patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) and permanent ileostomy. The study will enroll about 50 participants and collect videos of endoscopies that are done as part of standard of care. The videos will be centrally read to identify features that represent a broad range of inflammation and will be used to develop the EI. Participants will also be asked to participate in interviews, to understand the symptoms and impacts that are most important to participants for the development of a PRO.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
50
Mayo Clinic- Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGWashington University in St Louis School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGCleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGMcMaster University Medical Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGLHSC - University Campus
London, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGDevelop a PRO instrument for patients with Crohn's Disease and Permanent Ileostomy
Concept elicitation interviews focusing on the symptoms and impacts relevant to patients with CD and permanent ileostomy will be conducted and used to develop a PRO. Cognitive interviews will subsequently be conducted to determine respondent comprehension and relevance of the items.
Time frame: through study completion, and average of 1 year
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of 100-mm VAS.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the VAS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of RAM identified items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos for items identified during a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of Rutgeerts score and its component items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the Rutgeerts Score, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of CDEIS and its component items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the CDEIS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of SES-CD and its component items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the SES-CD, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the interrater reliability of 100-mm VAS.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the VAS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of RAM identified items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos for items identified during a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of Rutgeerts score and its component items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the Rutgeerts score, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of CDEIS and its component items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the CDEIS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of SES-CD and its component items.
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the SES-CD, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
Time frame: At baseline
Develop a novel index using a multiple regression approach with the dependent variables being the VAS and candidate independent variables including items having at least moderate interrater reliability.
A prototype index will be created using the VAS for global assessment of severity as the dependent criterion. Prospective validation of the endoscopic index will be performed in a future initiative outside of the scope of this study.
Time frame: through study completion, and average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.