This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and to explore the best individualized stimulus paradigm of transcranial Electrical Stimulation for insomnia patients.
This study employs a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, with blinding applied to both the assessors and patients, while the therapists remain unblinded. A total of 40 patients with insomnia disorders meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited from the Shanghai Mental Health Center and randomly assigned to either the tDCS active stimulation group or the tDCS sham stimulation group, with 20 patients in each group. All patients underwent clinical assessments, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and high-density electroencephalogram (EEG) parameter collections at baseline. Based on the MRI structural images and high-density EEG parameters, individualized modeling was conducted to determine specific stimulation parameter schemes (stimulation sites, stimulation intensity, and electrode placement methods). Detailed modeling methods and selection of stimulation parameters can be found in the intervention methods section. Stimulation was carried out for a total of 2 weeks, with one session per day on weekdays, totaling 10 sessions, each lasting thirty minutes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
The intervention uses transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The targeted brain regions are identified by conducting simultaneous fMRI-EEG data collection and sleep staging, comparing fMRI data between wakefulness and sleep states. Brain regions that show differences are calculated as potential targets for electrical stimulation. If no differentiated regions are found in a participant, specific areas are chosen based on individualized modeling results from previous experiments, targeting areas such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OPFC), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). Two regions are selected within each brain area for parameter scanning (with each stimulation lasting 10 seconds and EEG data recorded 10 seconds before and after stimulation). In our prior studies, we observed a decrease in EEG microstate complexity during sleep, with electrical stimulation influencing this complexity reduction to some
In the sham stimulation group, the placement of the tDCS electrodes is identical to that of the active stimulation group. After the stimulation begins, the current gradually increases over 15 seconds. However, upon reaching the therapeutic current level, it immediately begins to decrease, lowering to 0 mA within 15 seconds and remaining at 0 mA throughout the rest of the session. During the last 15 seconds of the stimulation, there is another gradual decrease in current to 0 mA. This approach creates a similar subjective sensation to the real stimulation, making it difficult for participants to discern which type of electrical stimulation they are receiving.
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGInsomnia Severity Index change
The change of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score.The scale consists of 7 items, scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, with a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate more severe insomnia.
Time frame: The study endpoint is set at 2 weeks after the end of treatment
Insomnia Severity Index score change
the change in the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score after tDCS intervention and 4 weeks post-intervention.
Time frame: after tDCS intervention and 4 weeks post-intervention
response/remission rate
Treatment effectiveness is defined as a reduction of more than 7 points in the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score post-treatment. Clinical remission is defined as a total ISI score of less than 8 points.
Time frame: After tDCS intervention, 2 weeks post-intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention
Sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, and nighttime sleep duration (as defined by the sleep diary).
Changes in sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, and nighttime sleep duration after tDCS intervention and 2 weeks post-tDCS intervention.
Time frame: After tDCS intervention and 2 weeks post-tDCS intervention
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 change
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 score change after tDCS intervention, 2 weeks post-tDCS intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention. For the HDRS17 , a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher (indicating at least moderate severity) is usually required for entry into a clinical trial. Higher scores indicate more severe depression.
Time frame: After tDCS intervention, 2 weeks post-tDCS intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Change
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score change after tDCS intervention, 2 weeks post-tDCS intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention.Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
Time frame: After tDCS intervention, 2 weeks post-tDCS intervention, and 4 weeks post-intervention