This clinical trial assesses the change in lymphatic structure from placement of an intravenous (IV) line and fluid administration using a diagnostic agent, indocyanine green (ICG), with SPY (Trademark) angiography in breast cancer patients at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Patients that are diagnosed with breast cancer with lymph node involvement often undergo treatment that includes surgery to remove the axillary nodes and radiation. Unfortunately, this procedure increases the incidence of BCRL in the surgical arm, as well as other problems including heaviness of the arm, fibrotic skin changes, and an increase in infection risk. Because of these symptoms, venipuncture (blood draw) is often avoided in these arms. Researchers want to show that placement of an IV line and fluid administration in patients at risk for BCRL will indeed not alter the lymphatic structure of the arm and will not change the incidence of BCRL by administering indocyanine green (ICG) dye to patients and assessing their arm lymphatics. ICG is a fluorescent dye that is able to be visualized by the SPY angiography imaging system as it travels through the lymphatic system, allowing researchers to assess how well blood flows throughout the body. Receiving ICG and undergoing SPY angiography may be effective in showing that placement of an IV and fluid administration in breast cancer patients at risk for BCRL will not alter the lymphatic structure of their arm and will not change the incidence of BCRL.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Assess the change in lymphatic architecture resulting from placement of an IV line and fluid administration in patients at risk for BCRL. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Identify changes in presence/severity of lymphedema based on: Ia. SOZO Digital Health Platform scale; Ib. Patient self-reported outcomes; Ic. Arm circumference. II. Assess association between SOZO scale, MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) lymphedema score (LS), and patient-reported outcomes. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Observe changes in mapping of superficial lymphatics that are responsible for the upper extremity arm with use of ICG dye and SPY angiography. II. Identify risk factors associated with higher rates of lymphedema after IV line/fluid administration. OUTLINE: Patients receive ICG dye subcutaneously (SC) and receive fluids IV over one hour and undergo SPY imaging and lymphedema assessment on day 1. Patients also receive ICG dye and undergo imaging and lymphedema assessments again at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months on study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Given IV
Given subcutaneously
Ancillary studies
Undergo lymphedema assessment
Undergo SPY imaging
Ancillary studies
Percentage of patients with worsening lymphedema in the affected arm
Measured by the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) lymphedema score (LS) (measured on a scale of 0 to 5) increased by at least 1 level. Will be estimated as a percentage of patients with MDACC lymphedema score that is at least 1 unit worse at 12 months than at baseline; 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in lymphedema severity based on SOZO Digital Health Platform scale
Will be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in patient self-reported outcomes scores
Will be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change in arm circumference measurements
Will be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Correlation between lymphedema assessment methods (1) MDACC LS, (2) patient-reported outcomes, (3) SOZO scale, and (4) arm circumference
Will be calculated (with appropriate confidence intervals); Pearson (or Spearman, as appropriate) correlation coefficients will be calculated to assess the strength of relationship between all four assessment methods (all time points). Graphical representation of data will be used to help understand and assess the nature of the relationship of these modalities.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.