Thread-embedding Combined With Auricular Acupuncture for Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview

Low back pain (LBP) is a significant global health issue, with cases expected to rise by 36.4% by 2050. Chronic LBP (cLBP), lasting over three months, is mostly non-specific cLBP (cNLBP), posing a challenge for effective management. Common treatments include medication, exercise, and acupuncture. This study explores the combined use of thread-embedding and auricular acupuncture for treating cNLBP, as combining these methods is thought to enhance effectiveness. Participants with cNLBP will be randomized into four groups to receive either the combination of both treatments, each treatment individually with a sham, or both shams. The study will last eight weeks, with four weeks of intervention and four weeks of follow-up. Treatment outcomes, including pain, disability, medication use, and quality of life, will be evaluated, along with monitoring for adverse effects.

Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health issue worldwide. In 2020, there were over half a billion cases of LBP globally, and by 2050, the total number of LBP cases is expected to increase by 36.4% worldwide. LBP accounts for 7.7% of total Years Lived with Disability, making it the largest contributor to the global disability burden. When lasting three months or more, LBP is classified as chronic (cLBP). Most cLBP is non-specific cLBP (cNLBP). Managing cNLBP remains challenging. Recommended therapies include short-term medication, manipulation, supervised exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and multidisciplinary treatment. According to the Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians, clinicians and patients should initially consider non-pharmacologic treatments, including acupuncture as one of the options. There is evidence regarding the effectiveness of thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) and auricular acupuncture (AA) in the treatment of cNLBP. TEA uses the principle of selecting points on the body, while AA involves selecting points on the ear. The difference in the point selection principles of these two methods has led clinicians to often combine them in hopes of enhancing treatment efficacy. However, evidence on the effectiveness of combining these two methods in treating cNLBP remains lacking. This study aims to clarify whether the combination of these methods is more effective than using them individually. Eligible participants with cNLBP, defined as LBP lasting more than three months without any reasonable explanation and determined by a physician to be nonspecific, will be enrolled and subsequently randomized into four groups: receiving the combination of TEA and AA (TEA + AA group), receiving TEA and sham AA (TEA + sham AA group), receiving AA and sham TEA (AA + sham TEA group), and receiving sham TEA and sham AA (Sham both group), with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. The study will last for eight weeks, with four weeks of intervention and four weeks of follow-up. AA and sham AA will be administered weekly during the four-week intervention (four sessions). TEA and sham TEA will be administered every two weeks during the four-week intervention (two sessions). Data on treatment efficacy will include disability index, pain score, amount of analgesic medication needed, quality of life score, and global improvement. Additionally, adverse effects will be monitored and recorded.