The primary objective of this study is to describe the transcriptional impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene on iPS differentiation mechanisms up to organoids derived from PIPO patient samples versus those derived from control / WT patients (generation of IPS from cultured cell lines), at different stages of their experimental ex vivo development.
Recruited patients will be sampled during a consultation: a blood sample and a biopsy will be taken directly from the patient. Once these samples have been taken, they will be cultured to be reprogrammed into iPS cells, then grown and differentiated into intestinal organoids. Various experiments will be carried out (as described in the outcomes) to identify at molecular, cellular and tissue level the mechanisms altered in patients with an R178, R257, R40 or A136 variant, assessing their consequence(s) on the development and functionality of the digestive mesenchyme.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
4
A skin biopsy and a blood sample will be taken to culture the iPS cells and intestinal organoids.
Phymedexp Inserm U1046 - Cnrs Umr 9214
Montpellier, France
Tens - Inserm Un Umr 1235
Nantes, France
AP-HP Hôpital Robert Debré
Paris, France
Description of the transcriptional impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene
Difference in transcript expression (%) in RNASeq transcriptomic analysis between samples carrying the R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene on the differentiation mechanisms of iPS up to organoids derived from PIPO patient samples versus those derived from control patients
Time frame: At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) through study completion, an average of 5 years
Evaluate the impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 variants of the ACTG2 gene on gastrointestinal contractile function between mutant versus WT organoids.
Difference (%) in isometric contraction force between mutant versus WT organoids by electrical stimulation and specific agonist.
Time frame: At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 years
Evaluate the immunofluorescence labeling differential between mutant and WT cells from IPS and organoids
Difference in fluorescence (%) between mutant and WT cells as cell stages from iPS to organoids
Time frame: At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 years
Evaluate the impact of R178, R257, R40 or A136 mutations of the ACTG2 gene on the actin network of fibroblasts derived from skin samples of diseased patients versus those of WTpatients.
Difference in actin network labeling by immunofluorescence (%) between skin fibroblasts from PIPO and WT patients.
Time frame: At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Evaluate the effect of reversion of the R178, R257, R40 or A136 mutation versus WT on functionality and contractility during differentiation of cells into organoids.
Difference in isometric contraction strength (%) between mutant versus WT versus revertant organoids via specific agonist and electrical stimulation.
Time frame: At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 years
Assessing the potential of a chemical library to correct the phenotype
Identification of molecules inducing a significant difference in isometric contraction force (%) between treated mutant organoids, untreated mutant organoids and treated and untreated WT
Time frame: At different stages of their experimental ex vivo development (mesenchymal progenitors, determined smooth muscle cells, differentiated smooth muscle cells and 3D organization of smooth muscle) an average of 5 years